Rumors of "dirty penalties" are un true and was "leaked by the Mayweather associates"

[Bogig]

The bottom line is no drug has been invented that will teach a fighter to learn the RIGHT HOOK that downed MORALES, the LEFT HOOK that downed hatton, the LEFT CROSS that downed Marquez and the UPPERCUT that downed Cotto. Pure common sense, drugs won't teach you how to execute new punches. And drugs won't teach you how to take solid punches. Its pure hard work and good training that allowed Pacman to learn those new punches.

Mayweather seems to be just hiding behind this whole drug issue because he knows he can very well lose this fight. And at the same time, drag Manny's name down the toilet by creating doubt on him, all without an shred of proof.

[Ben d great]

Wake up call to Mayweathers and Manny

At least Now Manny use the logic, He cant just take it easy on other people comments especially if it damaging.Being too good it wont work all the time. He should have file a case in Floyd Sr first statement for the reason not only he is top in the boxing world but to all fans and to his own self. On the other hand Mayweathers and et al. at least they know now you cant just make allegations without base or a bit of evidence, they already made a lot of damaged to the best fighter in the world. In doesnt matter if you are on the top of the boxing world before or not we should have keep our mouth clean on at least keep your self clean as well.

[Left Banned Tua]

Anybody can say it was made up by Mayweather and eventually someone was going to say it was made up by Mayweather. No surprise there. The fact is neither side of the story can be proven and it doesn't matter anyway. The only thing that mattered was that fight and Pac destroyed his own reputation by not submitting to random testing. No one should be allowed to say they will take the tests when they feel like it. They should have made random testing apart of the whole proses 10 years ago.

if pacquiao refused testing from a boxing commission then yes.

agreeing to the nsac but refusing what mayweather requests is not clear black and white.

it hurts his reputation somewhat but others also see why he refused.

[Ray*]

"37. On Decemeber 25, 2009, the New York Daily News reported that:

According with sources familiar with talks, Pacquiao's representative asked what penalties....

38. This is untrue and, on information was leaked by Myweather, Jr. and his representatives to further destroy Pacquiao's professional credibility and reputation"

Wrtitten by:
~Daniel M. Petrocelli (Cal S.B #97802)
~David Marroso (Cal S.B #211655)

Source:
http://www.boxingscene.com/filedcomplaint-pacquiao.pdf

Atlas and Tim Smith, guess you guys got fooled huh? At least this isnt from Arum's word but from the Lawyers it self.

Didnt see anything to the effective where it says it was untrue!!! The case was file sometime back and am sure the article came out last week.. So am confused where does it says tim smith's article was untrue??

[Blue Heffner]

What could have been so simple, became a massacre.

[iHateThePacMan]

This kinda fawk up, i think atlas should apologies. For god sakes your a jourlanist he suppose to remain neutral. The worst part he doesnt even have proof to support his findings.

im looking at this at neutral point of view, i think its all about egoes in both camp and who can give in to their demands with that said and done i think its because the bad blood between arum and floyd that killed this fight. its almost past 2 months and mostly like the fight wont happen on march 13th,

[Left Banned Tua]

Didnt see anything to the effective where it says it was untrue!!! The case was file sometime back and am sure the article came out last week.. So am confused where does it says tim smith's article was untrue??

read #37 and #38.

[iHateThePacMan]

i don't really want to **** on media guys.

they're just doing their job for the most part.

teddy is a good man. i like the guy.

if his source is lying to him , he's as much a victim of misinformation as pacquiao is. provided this is not true of course.

sounds like george bush- but isn't it the journalist responsibilit to check on the resources. Its poor journalism to me, and a lot of local journalist gets fired this way.

[Ray*]

read #37 and #38.

Yes i saw and read it but its a complaint from Team Pacqauio's lawyer, Not a statement from the writer of the article or anything else, Its just says the allegation is untrue, The judge HAD to decide if its true or not.

If the case starts and they ask Tim smith for evidence and he cannot provide one then the judge would say it was untrue, Then Tim Smith would have to print an apology in his daily paper or pay Pacquiao some compensation.

Until then NO-ONE knows if its true or not, If Tim smith provide emails to the effect that Team Pacquiao did indeed send Team Mayweather the email then what happens???

[Left Banned Tua]

sounds like george bush- but isn't it the journalist responsibilit to check on the resources. Its poor journalism to me, and a lot of local journalist gets fired this way.

like i said.

he considered the source reliable.

there was no way for him to check if the info is reliable.

plus tim smith reported the same thing , so you know someone was telling the story (whether it's true or not)

we don't know who his source is.

what if it's schaeffer? haymon? ellerbe?

they're part of the negotiations. they would know. they would be considered reliable sources.