Greatest heavyweight ever...realistically?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • joeandthebums
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 612
    • 31
    • 1
    • 7,521

    #101
    Originally posted by joeandthebums


    Please show me a heavyweight with a greater skill set.
    Originally posted by Elroy1
    Who are you talking about?

    I'll assume Ali (didn't bother reading all the tripe)
    No Joe Louis.

    Comment

    • Ray Corso
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2012
      • 7988
      • 610
      • 0
      • 21,253

      #102
      Joe Louis, there's no one close to him in technique and methods simply the best combination punching heavyweight ever.
      Trained by the great J. Blackburn Joe was taught to step and punch with power and force and his balance and compact punching was the best of all time, so far.
      Ray.

      Comment

      • beez721
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2005
        • 9637
        • 252
        • 55
        • 16,400

        #103
        Originally posted by Ray Corso
        Joe Louis, there's no one close to him in technique and methods simply the best combination punching heavyweight ever.
        Trained by the great J. Blackburn Joe was taught to step and punch with power and force and his balance and compact punching was the best of all time, so far.
        Ray.
        I agree. he threw his punches so short and compact. they seemed difficult to see coming and hard to defend against

        Comment

        • HedonisticFrog
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • May 2014
          • 318
          • 14
          • 1
          • 6,585

          #104
          For everyone dismissing the size difference between Ali and current heavyweights it really is significant. The Klitchko brothers are around 250lb while Ali was 200lb in the 60s. That's a 25% difference and isn't negligible. There's also much better strength and conditioning now than back then.

          There's a reason that small heavyweights like Evander Holyfield have a much higher KO ratio in cruiserweight before they move up to heavyweight. The only reason he did well as he did as a heavyweight was because he was a great fighter. Size really does make a huge difference and there's no getting around it.

          Comment

          • Weltschmerz
            Sehnsucht
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 16546
            • 698
            • 1,622
            • 27,699

            #105
            I would say Lennox Lewis is the strongest HW in history. Ali probably has the greatest resume, though.

            Comment

            • Daddy T
              BigDaddy
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2010
              • 5637
              • 198
              • 156
              • 12,260

              #106
              Ali is the greatest heavyweight ever. I'd have him as the favorite against anybody.

              Comment

              • LacedUp
                Still Smokin'
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 29171
                • 781
                • 381
                • 132,163

                #107
                Originally posted by HedonisticFrog
                For everyone dismissing the size difference between Ali and current heavyweights it really is significant. The Klitchko brothers are around 250lb while Ali was 200lb in the 60s. That's a 25% difference and isn't negligible. There's also much better strength and conditioning now than back then.

                There's a reason that small heavyweights like Evander Holyfield have a much higher KO ratio in cruiserweight before they move up to heavyweight. The only reason he did well as he did as a heavyweight was because he was a great fighter. Size really does make a huge difference and there's no getting around it.
                First of all, Ali was 6,3-6,4 in his prime. He was 215 not around 200 lbs. he weighed about 198lbs on his debut when he was a little skinny 18 year old fresh out of the amateurs. Ali was a proper heavyweight.

                Wlad is 6'5 and 240 on his best day. Ali's reach is 78", I believe Wlad's is 81". The size difference isn't so great that it's unfair at all. And Ali is bigger than guys like Haye and Byrd who gave Wlad some of his toughest work.

                But he's better than they are. Far better. Bigger balls, punch variety is greater, chin is better, stamina, footwork, head movement etc.

                Ali would make Wlad look like a mummy.

                Comment

                • Welsh Jon
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • May 2011
                  • 922
                  • 72
                  • 43
                  • 7,717

                  #108
                  Originally posted by LacedUp
                  First of all, Ali was 6,3-6,4 in his prime. He was 215 not around 200 lbs. he weighed about 198lbs on his debut when he was a little skinny 18 year old fresh out of the amateurs. Ali was a proper heavyweight.

                  Wlad is 6'5 and 240 on his best day. Ali's reach is 78", I believe Wlad's is 81". The size difference isn't so great that it's unfair at all. And Ali is bigger than guys like Haye and Byrd who gave Wlad some of his toughest work.

                  But he's better than they are. Far better. Bigger balls, punch variety is greater, chin is better, stamina, footwork, head movement etc.

                  Ali would make Wlad look like a mummy.
                  Yes!

                  I couldn't agree more with all of this

                  Comment

                  • New England
                    Strong champion.
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 37514
                    • 1,926
                    • 1,486
                    • 97,173

                    #109
                    Originally posted by TotalStud
                    Ha..

                    Time to compare footage of guys half the size of modern HWs and act surprised that they were faster...

                    Same **** different day



                    dude, joe louis ran several miles a day. most modern HW, klitschkos included, don't even run.



                    if louis sat around and ate he'd easily be 230 lbs. he was brewster sized. go back through my posts on the subject to see some further detail on it.


                    if brewster can stop wladimir, so can louis. they were the same size. 6'2", 77" reach, and brewster was loose at 225.

                    Comment

                    • New England
                      Strong champion.
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 37514
                      • 1,926
                      • 1,486
                      • 97,173

                      #110
                      Originally posted by LarryXXX
                      It is not just the speed..it is the technique,skill set along with the durability and the the level of opponents they faced...There is no heavyweight you can list with a better resume then Muhammad Ali...if so please list them...The man was 6'3-6'4 so he was far from small and moved like a middleweight and had power and was tough as nails and fought everyone...

                      people also underrate his power. a HW with athleticism and size like that can punch. he can hurt you / knock you out, but also cut you, bust your face up.

                      he stopped a lot of his opponents. frazier, foreman, liston, these were normally durable guys.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP