Who has defeated more fighters in their PRIME: Mayweather or Pacquiao?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jekbu
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 52
    • 0
    • 0
    • 6,139

    #91
    Originally posted by Calilloyd
    Barrera had two losses to Junior Jones(one by TKO) and two wars with one loss to Morales when he fought Pacquiao so he was not in his "absolute" prime. I can agree he was close but no way was he in his absolute physical prime.
    hmnnn.. so the not so prime manny is beating the **** out of all his opponents recently?

    geez.. im thinking what a prime manny can do..

    Comment

    • Doctor_Tenma
      Monster
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 33313
      • 1,327
      • 1,249
      • 58,127

      #92
      Originally posted by jkaisen41
      Styles make fights... Corrales would have taken off Barrera's head. Corrales is no slouch... he connected against anyone he fought (exception being Floyd)... nothing against Barrera but this would have been bad for him...

      JMM = Castillo... Castillo in his prime was never beaten he only lost on cuts... the only reason he has a bad rep is because of the weight thing. Marquez probably a slight better then Castillo.

      Hatton = Hatton

      Cotto can't even be compared to Genaro... they never fought in the same weight class... but if you want to at the time Genaro was considered the best at the weight and Cotto probably the best at WW

      Diaz = Baldomir

      Ledwabba, Sasakul = I don't know them enough to dare to compare them to someone
      Corrales would have taken Mab/ EM's head, this I agree with. Ganero would stand a really good chance at beating those 2 also.

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #93
        Originally posted by miron_lang
        I think the thread is about accomplishments.

        It's not a head to head matchup mate.



        Side notes:

        Barrera is 126-135 fighter
        Corrales is 130-147 fighter

        They are not the same size

        Castillo was stopped by Cesar Sotto a career Featherweight. I can say Pac never lost in his prime.
        Barrera is more 126-130.
        Corrales is more 130-140

        Comment

        • Cash Cow
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 7662
          • 342
          • 396
          • 8,143

          #94
          Originally posted by jrosales13
          LOL yea he did... I think it was for the 2nd fight. He threw a punch and then Morales tried to retaliate but Barrera used his foot work to get the hell out of the way.

          Comment

          • Calilloyd
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 4373
            • 124
            • 292
            • 10,868

            #95
            Originally posted by whirlwind
            The prime Barrera, JMM, Morales and Cotto who Pac fought even if they are past in their prime will still beat any fighter in Floyd resume if they are in the same weight classes. That's why most boxer experts (they are not same races with pac) chosen Pac in higher atg/legacy status than Floyd. I believe them because their words have more weight than Floyd fans who are bs on their own fighter.

            The Morales who Pacquiao fought is not beating the Corrales or Jose Luis Castillo that Mayweather fought. Barrera wouldn't have beaten beaten Corrales either. I would favor the JMM pac fought over any of them and Cotto over any welterweight Mayweather has fought.
            Last edited by Calilloyd; 12-17-2009, 03:09 AM.

            Comment

            • miron_lang
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2004
              • 4187
              • 1,389
              • 1,727
              • 18,862

              #96
              Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
              Barrera is more 126-130.
              Corrales is more 130-140
              that could be their optimum weight but MAB fought at 135 officially and Corralles fought at 147 officially.

              Corrales is bigger obviously. but MAB wins it if they are the same size.

              Comment

              • The Stone Roses
                Banned
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 892
                • 49
                • 0
                • 1,190

                #97
                morales, barrera, de la hoya were all past their prime...diaz is a nobody....cotto was plastered by margarito and had a war with clottey before pac decided to fight him and hatton was coming off a damaging loss to mayweather......mayweather's opponents have been fresher and in their prime....diego, zab, de la hoya at 154, undefeated hatton

                Comment

                • miron_lang
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 4187
                  • 1,389
                  • 1,727
                  • 18,862

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                  Corrales would have taken Mab/ EM's head, this I agree with. Gane

                  ro would stand a really good chance at beating those 2 also
                  .

                  No ****ing way LOL

                  Erik Morales UD's Genaro all month everyday same with Barrera. Genaro is not at that level.

                  Comment

                  • AFTER HOURS
                    Paul Hackett
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 1936
                    • 55
                    • 120
                    • 8,511

                    #99
                    Originally posted by The Stone Roses
                    morales, barrera, de la hoya were all past their prime...diaz is a nobody....cotto was plastered by margarito and had a war with clottey before pac decided to fight him and hatton was coming off a damaging loss to mayweather......mayweather's opponents have been fresher and in their prime....diego, zab, de la hoya at 154, undefeated hatton
                    was pacman undefeated when he fought all those past prime?

                    Comment

                    • jekbu
                      Up and Comer
                      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 52
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      • 6,139

                      #100
                      again.. being prime is subjective.

                      so can we say Pac, having already lost 3 times, (downed twice -i may be wrong) is beyond PRIME?

                      Pac is beating the hell out of his recent opponents and yet he is not PRIME.

                      His opponents, having lost some fight is not prime?

                      Can please someone please shed light?
                      Last edited by jekbu; 12-17-2009, 03:13 AM. Reason: grammar

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP