Let's be real.. prime Oscar would've whooped Pacquiao

[Sugarr]

how clean a punch can you get than rendering an opponent 4 knockdowns

You're talking about fights one and two combined.

Pacquiao had an amazing first round in their first fight. Other than that, I wasn't impressed much.

In their second fight, he did a better job but Marquez still landed the better shots (aside from the one that knocked Marquez down and the one that hurt him a bit later on in the fight).

[hugh grant]

Because Pac totally annihilated DLH at WW. We must give DLH the benefit of the doubt that he wasnt the best on the night he could have been.
Therefore the only argument i can make for DLH is that at his peak he would have aquited himself better against Pac. Not beat him though. At his peak would have recieved less of a one sided beating.

How good DLH ever was has always been in question, even though he won titles in different weights. They say it was because of his golden boy appeal and popularity rather than true ring greatness.

[Left Hook Tua]

Let me know when you come off your high.

CLEARLY.

that fight was mostly rounds that could have gone either way. except for the times jmm got hurt or pac got hurt.



polish up on your reading comprehension.

[Sugarr]

CLEARLY.

that fight was mostly rounds that could have gone either way. except for the times jmm got hurt or pac got hurt.



polish up on your reading comprehension.

Like I said, let me know when you're back to a clear mind state.

[baracuda]

hoya would've lasted longer.....

[J Mac]

I've seen a prime Pacquiao get out-boxed by an over the hill Morales.

I've seen a prime Pacquiao lose to Marquez twice.

True story.

ouch....... he's not wrong though.....

[jrosales13]

I don't remember round by round, but I had Marquez. Maybe you're giving it to Pacquiao because of his aggression (which is actually missed punches that are thrown wildly)?

Marquez landed the cleaner shots.

Do not assume how I scored the fight. But, my point is that there were a few close rounds that could of gone either way. There is no way that Pac or JMM clearly won 7rds. You can not honestly say you had JMM clearly winning 7rds. You might had JMM winning the fight. And, scored some close rounds in his favor and that is fine. But, there is no way JMM clearly won 7rds. So there is no way you can call that fight a robbery or a gift decision. You sound dumb when you say it. It was a close fight with like 3 or 4 swing rounds.

[Left Hook Tua]

Like I said, let me know when you're back to a clear mind state.

read my post again.

i said rounds CLEARLY won.

except for a handful of rounds that there was a clear winner , most of the rounds were tossups.



don't be so simple.

[Left Hook Tua]

lame ass alt.

if you're gonna troll , don't turn off your rep power.

wear your red karma bar with pride , troll.

[Sugarr]

Do not assume how I scored the fight. But, my point is that there were a few close rounds that could of gone either way. There is no way that Pac or JMM clearly won 7rds. You can not honestly say you had JMM clearly winning 7rds. You might had JMM winning the fight. And, scored some close rounds in his favor and that is fine. But, there is no way JMM clearly won 7rds. So there is no way you can call that fight a robbery or a gift decision. You sound dumb when you say it. It was a close fight with like 3 or 4 swing rounds.

Like you said, in contradicting yourself, don't assume how someone scores a fight.