except for a handful of rounds that there was a clear winner , most of the rounds were tossups.
don't be so simple.
I had the fighters winning some clear rounds, besides when they were hurt. I'll admit that there were a few tossup rounds, but in the end, Marquez deserved the win.
Are Pacquiao fans that uneducated? Have they ever seen a prime version of DLH?
There's no way, not at any weight class, that a prime Pacquiao would've beaten a prime DLH. He would've been too big, too strong and too fast for him. There's no other way around it.
What's even more surprising is that some of them are in denial that DLH wasn't weight-drained and over the hill.
i wouldn't even bother posting issues like this, the majority of the people on here now don't look at facts, they follow trends and have no real evidence to support a real argument. i miss how this forum use to be a couple years ago. we had one or two idiots here and there, but now it seems all the older posters are banned or have just said screw it and found other forums. i do agree with you, but i've said it many times before, i'm not gonna go into it and explain anymore. some dumb**** kid with no knowledge will just try and downgrade anything said.
In both Pacquiao vs Marquez fights, if Marquez just avoided hitting the canvas once...he would've won. Marquez won more rounds than Pacquiao and I don't think anyone can deny that I mean, if you knock an opponent 3 times but still get a draw I think it's pretty obvious
Comment