Pernell Whitaker vs Manny Pacquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dorruel2.0
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 2064
    • 169
    • 16
    • 12,846

    #51
    Originally posted by pactard99
    Tito was a plaster cheat.

    Prime Whitaker vs Prime PAC, Pernell kisses the canvass within the 1st half.
    your name says it all
    you dont watch boxing
    your a cheerleader. Sorry to break it to you moron but Tito didnt use plaster and a prime Trinidad whipes the floor with Manny and stops him in 4 TOPS

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 739
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #52
      Originally posted by King Burner
      Your wasting your time..he gives Floyd NO credit.
      Hey grown folks are talking stay out of this.... Try to catch some Whitaker fights first...

      Do your homework on Harry Greb...

      BTW

      A quitting ***** ass coward(Duran)>Floyd

      A quitting ***** ass coward(Duran)>P-Will

      What does that make Floyd and P-Will when they will probably never be greater than a quitting ***** coward.

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #53
        Originally posted by jrosales13
        Yea but if the best Mayweather comes out then the best Whitaker would come out. And, Whitaker would still have the advantage. Alst the McGirt fight was at WW. Whitaker was prime and untouchable as a LW. Arguably top 5 all time. You can even make a small case of being the greatest. Both Whitaker and Floyd were not as good at WW as they were in the lower divisions. So there best Floyd 130-140 to Whitaker 135/140. Whitaker beats him clearly.

        But, even at 147 Floyd punch output is not high. So with Whitaker defense and footword believe Floyd output might be even lower. There is no way he would be more offensive. He is a counterpuncher by nature. And, if he tried to take the lead. Whitaker will counterpunch and pot shot him to a victory.
        Again I don't see it. Pernell and Mayweather (Overall) are about the same size, both aren't that hard of punchers. But I could see Mayweather throwing 60+ punches per round. Like I said, Whitaker is an underrated puncher but he doesn't hit hard enough where Mayweather is gonna give him the same respect he gave Judah. Whitaker was still a very good WW. In this match up be it 135/147...that wouldn't play much of a role in who would win.

        Comment

        • El Castigador
          Banned
          • Dec 2009
          • 4151
          • 140
          • 0
          • 4,869

          #54
          Originally posted by jrosales13
          Hey grown folks are talking stay out of this.... Try to catch some Whitaker fights first...

          Do your homework on Harry Greb...

          BTW

          A quitting ***** ass coward(Duran)>Floyd

          A quitting ***** ass coward(Duran)>P-Will

          What does that make Floyd and P-Will when they will probably never be greater than a quitting ***** coward.
          Williams is a good fighter....Floyd is one of the greatest fighters.

          That cant be argued kiddo.

          Comment

          • dorruel2.0
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2009
            • 2064
            • 169
            • 16
            • 12,846

            #55
            Originally posted by jrosales13
            I disagree Whitaker defense was better. Again as a LW he could not be touch. This guys schooled and embarrassed ATG... This guy went up to 154 and cleary beat a very big very strong Velazquez. Velazquez is a guy who dropped Winky Wright 5 times. Yet he couldn't really hit a small Pernell. Pernell defense was better. Now Floyd offense is a little bit better than Whitaker. But, Whitaker defense was better.
            hard to say
            Floyd never lost with that Defense. The reason Pernell is better is because he has a pair and fought the best of his era

            Comment

            • jrosales13
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 32632
              • 739
              • 763
              • 40,023

              #56
              Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
              Again I don't see it. Pernell and Mayweather (Overall) are about the same size, both aren't that hard of punchers. But I could see Mayweather throwing 60+ punches per round. Like I said, Whitaker is an underrated puncher but he doesn't hit hard enough where Mayweather is gonna give him the same respect he gave Judah. Whitaker was still a very good WW. In this match up be it 135/147...that wouldn't play much of a role in who would win.
              Oh Dom....ok we will agree to disagree... IMO I think you overrating Floyd a lil bit and underrating Whitaker defense a lil bit.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 739
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #57
                Originally posted by King Burner
                Williams is a good fighter....Floyd is one of the greatest fighters.

                That cant be argued kiddo.
                But, not as good/great as a qutting ***** coward.

                And, that can not be argued.

                Comment

                • Doctor_Tenma
                  Monster
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 33313
                  • 1,327
                  • 1,249
                  • 58,127

                  #58
                  Originally posted by jrosales13
                  I disagree Whitaker defense was better. Again as a LW he could not be touch. This guys schooled and embarrassed ATG... This guy went up to 154 and cleary beat a very big very strong Velazquez. Velazquez is a guy who dropped Winky Wright 5 times. Yet he couldn't really hit a small Pernell. Pernell defense was better. Now Floyd offense is a little bit better than Whitaker. But, Whitaker defense was better.
                  JCV beat Winky when Winky wasn't Winky but none the less, JCV ain't no pushover. Whitaker's offense was slightly better then Mayweather's in my opinion. Pernell's body attack was more precise, simply better in the inside. Defense, both equally as good. What Mayweather has is, Mayweather has the quicker hands, more power and was slightly more accurate.

                  Comment

                  • Poet682006
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 17924
                    • 1,181
                    • 1,350
                    • 26,849

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                    Again I don't see it. Pernell and Mayweather (Overall) are about the same size, both aren't that hard of punchers. But I could see Mayweather throwing 60+ punches per round. Like I said, Whitaker is an underrated puncher but he doesn't hit hard enough where Mayweather is gonna give him the same respect he gave Judah. Whitaker was still a very good WW. In this match up be it 135/147...that wouldn't play much of a role in who would win.
                    When was the last time Floyd averaged 60+ punches a round? Back in the 1990s ffs?

                    Poet

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 739
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #60
                      Originally posted by dorruel2.0
                      hard to say
                      Floyd never lost with that Defense. The reason Pernell is better is because he has a pair and fought the best of his era
                      IMO Whitaker never lost a fight until Trinidad. Maybe Rivera it was close...

                      But, that is why IMO Whitaker defense was better cuz he proved it by really schooling the best of his era...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP