Pernell Whitaker vs Manny Pacquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 739
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #41
    Originally posted by pactard99
    Tito was a plaster cheat.

    Prime Whitaker vs Prime PAC, Pernell kisses the canvass within the 1st half.
    You are an idiot... how are you in the green?

    Show me a link where Tito used plaster?

    What do you know about Whitaker?

    Comment

    • Poet682006
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2007
      • 17924
      • 1,181
      • 1,350
      • 26,849

      #42
      Originally posted by pactard99
      Tito was a plaster cheat.

      Prime Whitaker vs Prime PAC, Pernell kisses the canvass within the 1st half.
      No. Just no.

      Poet

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #43
        Originally posted by jrosales13
        And, like I told him not really...

        Pernell is really a better defender than Floyd is and just a greater fighter period.
        Mayweather's defense is as good as Pernell's. The difference is (And alot of people confuse this) Whitaker's display of defense was more entertaining to watch. Although I love to watch Mayweather's display of defense also.

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 739
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #44
          Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
          You're right, Whitaker wouldn't have much trouble with those guys, doesn't mean he'd beat Mayweather. Remember, Whitaker struggled with McGirt in the 1st bout and you could even debate that McGirt could have gotten a draw. Now Mayweather > McGirt. Of course I'm not gonna use that as an example because Boxing doesn't work that way. All I'm saying is that Mayweather would look alot better against Whitaker then he did against Zab Judah, not in the competitive department but in that we'll see a more offensive Mayweather, the best Mayweather will come out.
          Yea but if the best Mayweather comes out then the best Whitaker would come out. And, Whitaker would still have the advantage. Alst the McGirt fight was at WW. Whitaker was prime and untouchable as a LW. Arguably top 5 all time. You can even make a small case of being the greatest. Both Whitaker and Floyd were not as good at WW as they were in the lower divisions. So there best Floyd 130-140 to Whitaker 135/140. Whitaker beats him clearly.

          But, even at 147 Floyd punch output is not high. So with Whitaker defense and footword believe Floyd output might be even lower. There is no way he would be more offensive. He is a counterpuncher by nature. And, if he tried to take the lead. Whitaker will counterpunch and pot shot him to a victory.

          Comment

          • pactard99
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 155
            • 14
            • 1
            • 197

            #45
            Originally posted by jrosales13
            You are an idiot... how are you in the green?

            Show me a link where Tito used plaster?

            What do you know about Whitaker?
            No you are the idiot. Resto, Tito, Margarito the three Amigos.

            Comment

            • El Castigador
              Banned
              • Dec 2009
              • 4151
              • 140
              • 0
              • 4,869

              #46
              Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
              Mayweather's defense is as good as Pernell's. The difference is (And alot of people confuse this) Whitaker's display of defense was more entertaining to watch. Although I love to watch Mayweather's display of defense also.
              Your wasting your time..he gives Floyd NO credit.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 739
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #47
                Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                Mayweather's defense is as good as Pernell's. The difference is (And alot of people confuse this) Whitaker's display of defense was more entertaining to watch. Although I love to watch Mayweather's display of defense also.
                I disagree Whitaker defense was better. Again as a LW he could not be touch. This guys schooled and embarrassed ATG... This guy went up to 154 and cleary beat a very big very strong Velazquez. Velazquez is a guy who dropped Winky Wright 5 times. Yet he couldn't really hit a small Pernell. Pernell defense was better. Now Floyd offense is a little bit better than Whitaker. But, Whitaker defense was better.

                Comment

                • Poet682006
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 17924
                  • 1,181
                  • 1,350
                  • 26,849

                  #48
                  Originally posted by jrosales13
                  Yea but if the best Mayweather comes out then the best Whitaker would come out. And, Whitaker would still have the advantage. Alst the McGirt fight was at WW. Whitaker was prime and untouchable as a LW. Arguably top 5 all time. You can even make a small case of being the greatest. Both Whitaker and Floyd were not as good at WW as they were in the lower divisions. So there best Floyd 130-140 to Whitaker 135/140. Whitaker beats him clearly.

                  But, even at 147 Floyd punch output is not high. So with Whitaker defense and footword believe Floyd output might be even lower. There is no way he would be more offensive. He is a counterpuncher by nature. And, if he tried to take the lead. Whitaker will counterpunch and pot shot him to a victory.
                  Even if their defenses are even (and I still say Whitaker's was better), Pernell was MUCH more effective offensively than Mayweather. Unlike Floyd, Whitaker had a pretty high work rate.

                  Poet

                  Comment

                  • jrosales13
                    undisputed champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 32632
                    • 739
                    • 763
                    • 40,023

                    #49
                    Originally posted by pactard99
                    No you are the idiot. Resto, Tito, Margarito the three Amigos.
                    Link where Tito had plaster?

                    Comment

                    • Poet682006
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 17924
                      • 1,181
                      • 1,350
                      • 26,849

                      #50
                      Originally posted by King Burner
                      Your wasting your time..he gives Floyd NO credit.
                      You're wasting your time.....you give NO fighter credit OTHER than Floyd

                      Poet

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP