Roy Jones was not taleneted...he was ATHLETIC.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sippiguy
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 53
    • 2
    • 0
    • 6,087

    #81
    I don't understand why people are name calling and getting upset with a person because they have an opinion that's different from their own.

    Comment

    • GlovesOfHaste
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 139
      • 4
      • 2
      • 6,183

      #82
      Originally posted by King Burner
      Took you long enough to google Roy Jones and Vince Carter....****ing *******s trying to act like they know stuff out side of pac.
      You want a response on your thread and yet when people disagree with you, you shut them off. LOL


      Typical dumbass

      Comment

      • El Castigador
        Banned
        • Dec 2009
        • 4151
        • 140
        • 0
        • 4,869

        #83
        Originally posted by sippiguy
        I don't understand why people are name calling and getting upset with a person because they have an opinion that's different from their own.
        Exactly...


        where in this thread did I say Roy was a ****ty fighter????

        Comment

        • MASSMAN
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 292
          • 6
          • 0
          • 6,379

          #84
          Roy was technically flawed!

          Roy Jones has an unorthodoxed style of boxing. The way he always led with his left arm out was one of the biggest defensive flaws he ever had. His great reflexes enabled him to slip in and out of other punchers range. He also got away with fighting a bunch of C and D level fighters during his lightheavyweight reign. Anyone with an educated right hand should have been able to expose that flaw but his athleticism is what kept him out of trouble. He was never skilled enough to fight on the inside, but fast and athletic enough to pot shot you on the outside with distance to escape. He was definitely more athletic than boxing skilled.

          Comment

          • GlovesOfHaste
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 139
            • 4
            • 2
            • 6,183

            #85
            Originally posted by King Burner
            Exactly...


            where in this thread did I say Roy was a ****ty fighter????
            Wasnt the post pertaining to you?Coz you're calling person names who disagree with you?

            Comment

            • MASSMAN
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 292
              • 6
              • 0
              • 6,379

              #86
              Its called immaturity!! LOL

              Comment

              • BKM-
                05-
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 8653
                • 952
                • 1,095
                • 49,234

                #87
                Originally posted by King Burner
                There is a difference........

                Roy Jones got by on pure reflexes, strength, and athleticsm.

                He was just bigger faster and stronger then everyone..he never used talent....and by the time he got old and easy to hit...he didnt have a fundemental background to keep him off the mat.

                I look at him like Michael Vick is in the NFL.........fast, exciting, big arm but no accuracy and awareness about what he does.


                Look at Mayweather Jr............like Peyton Manning, efficient, smart, accurate, moderate arm, rarely makes mistakes, fundementally sound, and has top notch intelligence and awareness.

                I believe thats the difference between TALENT and being ATHLETIC.


                Heres an NBA example for those not familiar with football:

                Look at one Vince Carter...high flying, dunk on you, crazy wild dunks, crazy hops, a good exciting young player who couldnt soot a basic jumper, didnt play defense and was a bad passer.

                Now look at Kobe Bryant.........high flying, dunk on you, crazy wild dunks, a good exciting young player who has an accurate jumpe and 3 point shot, very clutch, is the best on ball defender in the NBA and the all around best player and a guy who gets his teamates involved.


                Thats the difference.

                Im not a Roy Jones hater.........I was a fan..but he weas not talented...he was just extremely athletic.....he culdve played in the NBA or NFL if he applied himself.
                Vince Carter is actually a pretty damn talented player now.

                Comment

                • Thawisejester
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 43
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  • 6,071

                  #88
                  reflexes, strength, and athleticsm===Talent!!

                  Comment

                  • S A M U R A I
                    Bulletproof
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 181694
                    • 1,495
                    • 1,324
                    • 1,419,318

                    #89
                    What's up... did someone say Roy was more talented than Floyd, that's why we get this thread?



                    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                    Comment

                    • elgaringo
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 1597
                      • 26
                      • 9
                      • 8,018

                      #90
                      Originally posted by King Burner
                      I look at Wlad like at Pac.. a guy you had to teach how to be a good boxer.

                      No one had to teach Roy his reflexes, and speed...

                      BUT...what Im saying is when he lost speed and reflexes..he had no BOXING ABILITY to compnesate for it.
                      he had and still has boxing ability and a whole lot of talent! He just has one of them styles that when his BOXING skills started to wane (speed, reflexes, concentration) albeit with age, that you cant do at top level without great punch resistance! Plain and simple! frankly you've lost credibility if you had any to begin with that is lol. The best thing you could do is say you were hasty in your choice of words!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP