Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HBO Boxing has PACQUIAO as Fighter of the Decade!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Talisayen View Post
    Don't beleive that mother****er, he's **** is still swollen from the beatings Cotto got from Pacquiao.
    I dont thats why I offered him a no win bet....lol

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
      no.

      now they say they know the decade is 2000-2009.
      they just think you should see what happens in 2010 to judge 2000-2009.
      No man, theres still debate amongst *****s whether 2010 should be included in the decade...

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
        a fight in the next decade doesn't affect people's resume in the previous decade.

        lebron james won the mvp last year.

        if he sucks this year does he mean he don't get the trophy from last year?



        2000-2009 is the decade.

        you have to look at people's resume in those years.

        not wait and see what happens in 2010 to see who deserves recognition for 2000-2009.

        that just doesn't make any sense.
        In theory you are right, but realistically thats not how things work.

        Mike Tyson is a perfect example. In the 1980's he was put on a pedastal with Ali, dempsey and Joe Louis. After what happened in 1990, people saw his 80's career in a whole different light.

        All of the champions he defeated in the 80s became bums overnight and Tyson was labled a hype job. Dont be surprised if something similar happens to the loser of March 13th, whether it be Pac or Mayweather.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bigdognyc View Post
          I dont thats why I offered him a no win bet....lol
          I just see him trolling around and disquising his swollen **** as a boxing fan.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dondi33O View Post
            Good luck and I hope when Pac is through with you he leaves money on the dresser. because he truly cares for you.
            Who said anything about Pac???

            I offer you another bet... If you can post at least one nuthuggery post regarding Pac which I wrote.... I leave the site.. If not then I get your account....

            Is it a deal???

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Soir View Post
              In theory you are right, but realistically thats not how things work.

              Mike Tyson is a perfect example. In the 1980's he was put on a pedastal with Ali, dempsey and Joe Louis. After what happened in 1990, people saw his 80's career in a whole different light.

              All of the champions he defeated in the 80s became bums overnight and Tyson was labled a hype job. Dont be surprised if something similar happens to the loser of March 13th, whether it be Pac or Mayweather.
              it's an award.

              most will give it to pac. deal with it.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bigdognyc View Post
                You make it seem as if you never nut hugged COTTO....


                Ok, Ill give you the bet then.... If I can prove that you have posted Cotto nut huggery posts then I take your account....

                What says you???
                Respecting a fighter for his accomplishments is one thing, respecting a fighter is another but blindly ignoring the truth is lunacy and or obsession. I can show a million threads(mostly Pac or Filipinos) that are just blindly hugging with no knowledge.
                Why dont you bump the thread where I say Cotto's mind is messed up and I think he will never be the same? Why because it shows Im fair and see his negative side too. Like Floyd having great skill and also being special but not fighting the best. Like Margarito being all heart but a piece of crap for cheating. Like Pac being a legend killer but always tryng to get an advantage before the fights.
                All these things show that I tell it like it is and the *******s are the only ones who act like I kicked over a Filipino Jesus statue. Obsessed much?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Soir View Post
                  In theory you are right, but realistically thats not how things work.

                  Mike Tyson is a perfect example. In the 1980's he was put on a pedastal with Ali, dempsey and Joe Louis. After what happened in 1990, people saw his 80's career in a whole different light.

                  All of the champions he defeated in the 80s became bums overnight and Tyson was labled a hype job. Dont be surprised if something similar happens to the loser of March 13th, whether it be Pac or Mayweather.
                  Thats completely ridiculous to say seeing that Pacquiao actually has names on his resume. What you're trying to imply is that if Floyd beats Pacquiao next year, the sages of history will ultimately look back on Pac's career from 2000-2009 and say he beat nothing but bums like Barrera, Morales, Marquez, Hatton, Cotto? Do you realize how ****** this sounds? We're talking about some CERTIFIED ATG's and hall of famers that would all of a sudden become overrated nobodys just because Floyd beat Pacquiao? How pretentious.

                  You Floyd fans need to get a grip of reality. It is majority consensus which decides what label is best fitting a fighter. Not just one opinion. HBO is just one opinion, but the way things seem is that the the boxing community all feel the same way.

                  And you just cant start changing the meaning of certain words just to fit and serve and manipulate your argument. You can't change the meaning of "fan" like yall were trying to a year ago and you can't change the meaning of "decade" either.
                  Last edited by 2501; 12-12-2009, 02:29 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Dondi33O View Post
                    Respecting a fighter for his accomplishments is one thing, respecting a fighter is another but blindly ignoring the truth is lunacy and or obsession. I can show a million threads(mostly Pac or Filipinos) that are just blindly hugging with no knowledge.
                    Why dont you bump the thread where I say Cotto's mind is messed up and I think he will never be the same? Why because it shows Im fair and see his negative side too. Like Floyd having great skill and also being special but not fighting the best. Like Margarito being all heart but a piece of crap for cheating. Like Pac being a legend killer but always tring to get an advantage before the fights.
                    All these things show that I tell it like it is and the *******s are the only ones who act like I kicked over a Filipino Jesus statue. Obsessed much?
                    Ok, so Im Filipino...... PROVE to everyone that I nuthugged PACQUIAO....


                    Its pretty simple.... I have hundreds of posts under NYCBIGDOG or NYCBIGDOGII..... Surely, you can find ONE SINGLE post where I nuthugged Pac....

                    Come on ******.... Lets make this bet happen...

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by 2501 View Post
                      Thats completely ridiculous to say seeing that Pacquiao actually has names on his resume. What you're trying to imply is that if Floyd beats Pacquiao next year, the sages of history will ultimately look back on Pac's career from 2000-2009 and say he beat nothing but bums like Barrera, Morales, Marquez, Hatton, Cotto? Do you realize how ****** this sounds? We're talking about some CERTIFIED ATG's and hall of famers.

                      You Floyd fans need to get a grip of reality. It is majority consensus which decides what label is best fitting a fighter. Not just one opinion. HBO is just one opinion, but the way things seem is that the the boxing community all feel the same way.

                      And you just cant start changing the meaning of certain words just to fit and serve and manipulate your argument. You can't change the meaning of "fan" like yall were trying to a year ago and you can't change the meaning of "decade" either.
                      fan = doesn't have to mean someone who roots for a person or team. as long as they watch him even if it's to root for him/them to lose they're a fan

                      decade = 11 years

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP