Originally posted by Talisayen
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
HBO Boxing has PACQUIAO as Fighter of the Decade!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Posta fight in the next decade doesn't affect people's resume in the previous decade.
lebron james won the mvp last year.
if he sucks this year does he mean he don't get the trophy from last year?
2000-2009 is the decade.
you have to look at people's resume in those years.
not wait and see what happens in 2010 to see who deserves recognition for 2000-2009.
that just doesn't make any sense.
Mike Tyson is a perfect example. In the 1980's he was put on a pedastal with Ali, dempsey and Joe Louis. After what happened in 1990, people saw his 80's career in a whole different light.
All of the champions he defeated in the 80s became bums overnight and Tyson was labled a hype job. Dont be surprised if something similar happens to the loser of March 13th, whether it be Pac or Mayweather.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dondi33O View PostGood luck and I hope when Pac is through with you he leaves money on the dresser.because he truly cares for you.
I offer you another bet... If you can post at least one nuthuggery post regarding Pac which I wrote.... I leave the site.. If not then I get your account....
Is it a deal???
Comment
-
Originally posted by Soir View PostIn theory you are right, but realistically thats not how things work.
Mike Tyson is a perfect example. In the 1980's he was put on a pedastal with Ali, dempsey and Joe Louis. After what happened in 1990, people saw his 80's career in a whole different light.
All of the champions he defeated in the 80s became bums overnight and Tyson was labled a hype job. Dont be surprised if something similar happens to the loser of March 13th, whether it be Pac or Mayweather.
most will give it to pac. deal with it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdognyc View PostYou make it seem as if you never nut hugged COTTO....
Ok, Ill give you the bet then.... If I can prove that you have posted Cotto nut huggery posts then I take your account....
What says you???
Why dont you bump the thread where I say Cotto's mind is messed up and I think he will never be the same? Why because it shows Im fair and see his negative side too. Like Floyd having great skill and also being special but not fighting the best. Like Margarito being all heart but a piece of crap for cheating. Like Pac being a legend killer but always tryng to get an advantage before the fights.
All these things show that I tell it like it is and the *******s are the only ones who act like I kicked over a Filipino Jesus statue. Obsessed much?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Soir View PostIn theory you are right, but realistically thats not how things work.
Mike Tyson is a perfect example. In the 1980's he was put on a pedastal with Ali, dempsey and Joe Louis. After what happened in 1990, people saw his 80's career in a whole different light.
All of the champions he defeated in the 80s became bums overnight and Tyson was labled a hype job. Dont be surprised if something similar happens to the loser of March 13th, whether it be Pac or Mayweather.
You Floyd fans need to get a grip of reality. It is majority consensus which decides what label is best fitting a fighter. Not just one opinion. HBO is just one opinion, but the way things seem is that the the boxing community all feel the same way.
And you just cant start changing the meaning of certain words just to fit and serve and manipulate your argument. You can't change the meaning of "fan" like yall were trying to a year ago and you can't change the meaning of "decade" either.Last edited by 2501; 12-12-2009, 02:29 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dondi33O View PostRespecting a fighter for his accomplishments is one thing, respecting a fighter is another but blindly ignoring the truth is lunacy and or obsession. I can show a million threads(mostly Pac or Filipinos) that are just blindly hugging with no knowledge.
Why dont you bump the thread where I say Cotto's mind is messed up and I think he will never be the same? Why because it shows Im fair and see his negative side too. Like Floyd having great skill and also being special but not fighting the best. Like Margarito being all heart but a piece of crap for cheating. Like Pac being a legend killer but always tring to get an advantage before the fights.
All these things show that I tell it like it is and the *******s are the only ones who act like I kicked over a Filipino Jesus statue. Obsessed much?
Its pretty simple.... I have hundreds of posts under NYCBIGDOG or NYCBIGDOGII..... Surely, you can find ONE SINGLE post where I nuthugged Pac....
Come on ******.... Lets make this bet happen...
Comment
-
Originally posted by 2501 View PostThats completely ridiculous to say seeing that Pacquiao actually has names on his resume. What you're trying to imply is that if Floyd beats Pacquiao next year, the sages of history will ultimately look back on Pac's career from 2000-2009 and say he beat nothing but bums like Barrera, Morales, Marquez, Hatton, Cotto? Do you realize how ****** this sounds? We're talking about some CERTIFIED ATG's and hall of famers.
You Floyd fans need to get a grip of reality. It is majority consensus which decides what label is best fitting a fighter. Not just one opinion. HBO is just one opinion, but the way things seem is that the the boxing community all feel the same way.
And you just cant start changing the meaning of certain words just to fit and serve and manipulate your argument. You can't change the meaning of "fan" like yall were trying to a year ago and you can't change the meaning of "decade" either.
decade = 11 years
Comment
Comment