LOL, Cotto involved in Sex Assault charges

[Del Coqui]

So if he did do it this is still somebody's sister or daughter. Why the double standard?

lets get something clear, if he really offended her "spirituallity and morals" why keep that low income job? it sounds pretty obvious he was ****ing her, why would he keep an employee who wasn't giving him what he wanted? I feel you on the sister, mother thing, but she also brought it on herself.

[Ivansmamma]

So if he did do it this is still somebody's sister or daughter. Why the double standard?

You misunderstod my post, from a juridical perspective i think he should get away with it. When considering a law you can't look at how it would benefit you personally. You have to look at whats best for society as a whole. Anything else would be nepotism.

[JAB5239]

lets get something clear, if he really offended her "spirituallity and morals" why keep that low income job? it sounds pretty obvious he was ****ing her, why would he keep an employee who wasn't giving him what he wanted? I feel you on the sister, mother thing, but she also brought it on herself.

If this really happened, how did she bring it on herself? By not quitting a job she probably needed? Either way right is right and wrong is wrong. If Cotto did it he was wrong, end of story.

[Ray*]

You misunderstod my post, from a juridical perspective i think he should get away with it. When considering a law you can't look at how it would benefit you personally. You have to look at whats best for society as a whole. Anything else would be nepotism.

Am sensing sarcasm in your posts.

[JAB5239]

You misunderstod my post, from a juridical perspective i think he should get away with it. When considering a law you can't look at how it would benefit you personally. You have to look at whats best for society as a whole. Anything else would be nepotism.

So you're saying it is "best for society as a whole" to let celebrities get away with crimes. Is that it?

[mrpain81]

I bet Jim Lampley is going to try to get a job at that apartment complex now.

[Ivansmamma]

that is just sad.

i hope your mom/sister gets ******ed by a boxing champion. so that you can use that reasoning of yours.

It saddens me that a theoretical discussion of a juridical situation seems to get you upset.

[Spray_resistant]

Thanks for sharing the article.
Sad what happened but to judge this people need to understand the latin american mucho culture.Behaviour is totally different to the Anglo Saxons based culture.

Wow great job stereotyping ppl......

[JAB5239]

It saddens me that a theoretical discussion of a juridical situation seems to get you upset.

Come on now, you already said Cotto should get away with a crime because he was a champion.You've basically advocated sexual harassment as long as you're a celebrity. No?

[Ivansmamma]

So you're saying it is "best for society as a whole" to let celebrities get away with crimes. Is that it?

No, i never mentioned the word celebrities. Most celebrities are what i consider worthless degenerates.
Miguel Cotto as a boxing champions has acted like a good role model, taking on the best, showing heart and determination, never bad mouthing his opponent. He has given much to the public. Therfore society should be lenient. Considering giving him another chance and preserving his positive value for society. It's about giving and taking, Cotto has given much, now society has the chance to show appreciation of him when he is in need. His career and all he has done should not be destroyed by one possible mistake