MAYWEATHER should not be consider a 6 time world champion!

[ny123]

But, who would of won? So you win fights on paper now? You don't win the fights in the ring no more? On paper Zab beats Baldomir on the ring who won? Yea you are wrong again.

i agree you win fights in the ring and zab lost to baldo but zab was the champion when floyd fought him there should be no special rule because you dont like floyd that if he beats a fighter with a belt regardless if that fighter deserves that belt or not or is the best fighter in the division he still is the champion and was a bigger challenge to floyd then diaz was to pac

[baracuda]

wtf are you talking about my example was to show how the amateurs and pro game differs and how you cant judge a loss in the amateurs because it doesnt always translate to the pro game another example is pavlik and taylor. go back to jerking off to pacs workout videos we are talking about boxers other then pac here

.....lol....go back to making bad predictions.....lol.........

[ny123]

Nobody is arguing Baldomir-Judah. The argument is the BS title Floyd got from Zab. And, the title Pac got from Diaz.

Which is better? Winning a title from a guy who lost but only kept the belt of a technicality or winning a belt from a legit champ who was undefeated at that weight?

the argument wasnt which one is better but if floyd deserves a belt for beating zab

[jrosales13]

i agree you win fights in the ring and zab lost to baldo but zab was the champion when floyd fought him there should be no special rule because you dont like floyd that if he beats a fighter with a belt regardless if that fighter deserves that belt or not or is the best fighter in the division he still is the champion and was a bigger challenge to floyd then diaz was to pac

How can you still be champ after you lose? And, how can you be a bigger challenge after to loosing to a guy like Baldomir then somebody who is undefeated in the weightclass? There should be no special rule because you like Floyd.

[jrosales13]

the argument wasnt which one is better but if floyd deserves a belt for beating zab

How can Zab deserve having a belt after loosing?

[-Swizzy-]

JUDAH had more talent my ass.

You know that DAVID DIAZ beat living **** out of JUDAH?

lol @ that standing 8 count. never saw the fight and it looks as though diaz got the better of him from what I see there but that standing count the ref gave judah was bull*****.

[Cash Cow]

Nobody is arguing Baldomir-Judah. The argument is the BS title Floyd got from Zab. And, the title Pac got from Diaz.

Which is better? Winning a title from a guy who lost but only kept the belt of a technicality or winning a belt from a legit champ who was undefeated at that weight?

so this thread is about recognizable titles?

[letsgobrady]

Not necessary true. Cuz the IBF probably would of stripped Baldomir before the Floyd fight.

your right about that but even though david diaz had a legatimate claim at his tittle a win over judah is better than a win over diaz imo, david diaz was like an after thought even though he had a tittle no one cared about him even with out a tittle zab was still considered a major fight for anyone at ww

[Cash Cow]

How can you still be champ after you lose? And, how can you be a bigger challenge after to loosing to a guy like Baldomir then somebody who is undefeated in the weightclass? There should be no special rule because you like Floyd.

If we are talking about titles what about Pac's OPBF flyweight title, IBO light welterweight title & WBA Super World featherweight titles?

OPBF?
IBO?
WBA?

are those even recognized?

[^^Cody^^]

That belt which he won against JUDAH is complete garbage.

He is 5 time world champion in 5 different weight classes.

No, dumbass.