MAYWEATHER should not be consider a 6 time world champion!
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Mentally is the biggest thing in boxing. I am sorry if you don't have the mentality then you are not a good boxer. I don't care how fast you are, how hard you hit, and how good move. if you not there mentally then you are not going to be good. Oba Carr had skills but he didn't have the mental part of the game. So to answer your question obviously Baldomir won. Baldomir was the better fighter. Judah should of gotten a rematch and proved other wise.Comment
-
Comment
-
You put Spadafora as an example which was a bad example. The point of this argument was that Judah should of not had a title when he fought Floyd. Cuz he lost to Baldomir. NY made cameback with saying well Diaz was the weakest. Zab has more skills than David. But, you can't compare cuz Diaz was a legit title holder who was undefeated as a LW. While Zab was coming of a lose. What side are you taking bro?Comment
-
wrong again that is called an example to show how the amateur and pro games differ and that just because you beat someone in the amateurs doesnt mean your a better pro boxer did zab fight diaz as a pro and if he did would diaz have been the fav? anyone with common sense can see what im getting at i guess you dont have any.Comment
-
Nice av pic,hope u dont mind me stealing it
Forget about this thread,the TS received bad brain damage when gabriel gonzaga landed that nice KO'ing head kick on the head of his.Comment
-
But, who would of won? So you win fights on paper now? You don't win the fights in the ring no more? On paper Zab beats Baldomir on the ring who won? Yea you are wrong again.wrong again that is called an example to show how the amateur and pro games differ and that just because you beat someone in the amateurs doesnt mean your a better pro boxer did zab fight diaz as a pro and if he did would diaz have been the fav? anyone with common sense can see what im getting at i guess you dont have any.Comment
-
I aint arguing against that...You put Spadafora as an example which was a bad example. The point of this argument was that Judah should of not had a title when he fought Floyd. Cuz he lost to Baldomir. NY made cameback with saying well Diaz was the weakest. Zab has more skills than David. But, you can't compare cuz Diaz was a legit title holder who was undefeated as a LW. While Zab was coming of a lose. What side are you taking bro?
I'm jus saying just cuz Diaz beat Judah in the amateurs, doesn't mean he'd beat him in the pros...perfect example=Cotto-AbdullaevComment

Comment