How is Manny Pacquiao a "7 divisional titleist"?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pbftxrs316
    Ellerbe's bum cleaner
    • Aug 2006
    • 4102
    • 201
    • 0
    • 10,761

    #21
    i don't see how manny could be considered a ww champ when he beat a guy at 145---it sickens me---well, it doesn't really---but what the hell---

    Comment

    • Mirko CROCOP
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 285
      • 19
      • 7
      • 365

      #22
      Originally posted by cyutetrick
      hasnt floyd held 3 titles at welterweight?
      He won garbage belt against JUDAH and WBC against tomato can BALDOMIR.

      Comment

      • baracuda
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 10779
        • 259
        • 569
        • 11,470

        #23
        the only man to win titles in 7 weight divisions .....packy is the man.....he is and will be a record holder for decades.....

        Comment

        • baracuda
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 10779
          • 259
          • 569
          • 11,470

          #24
          Originally posted by pbftxrs316
          i don't see how manny could be considered a ww champ when he beat a guy at 145---it sickens me---well, it doesn't really---but what the hell---
          floyd's been cherrypickin his whole carrer.....

          Comment

          • Mirko CROCOP
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 285
            • 19
            • 7
            • 365

            #25
            Number 1 P4P boxer in the world

            MANNYYYYYYYYYYYYY PACQUIAOOOOOOOO

            Comment

            • Easy-E
              Gotta want it
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 22686
              • 865
              • 1,739
              • 32,777

              #26
              Originally posted by Mirko CROCOP
              How is PAVLIK lineal at 160 and he lost to HOPKINS when he moved up?

              You are ****** idiot who doesnt know **** about boxing.

              Go kill yourself.
              Exactly. The line is essentially dead.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 739
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #27
                Originally posted by Easy-E
                that is what I was saying. That people are lumping the ring title and the lineal title together when they should not be.

                Not sure how Pac was lineal at 140 when he beat Hatton, who had moved to 147 and lost....
                Hatton won the lineal title by beating Kostya at 140. He had one fight at WW against Collazo came back down to 140 to defend his lineal 140. Then had another fight at 147 against Floyd then went back down to 140 to defend his lineal belt. Then he lost it to Pac. Is like Pavlik is the still the MW champ even though he fought B-Hop at 170. JMM by all accounts is still the lineal LW champ even though he fought at WW. Until you give up the belt to campaign at a higher weight. is when you not the champ anymore. But, Hatton never campaigned at WW. He just had 2 fights in 2 different time span. Is like remember Henry Amrstrong had 3 lineal belts in 3 different weightclass at the same time. And, went up and down in weight defending them. Anyways I hope I didn't lose you but that is how Hatton was still the lineal champ at 140 he never lost it and never gave it up.

                Comment

                • Mirko CROCOP
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 285
                  • 19
                  • 7
                  • 365

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Easy-E
                  Exactly. The line is essentially dead.
                  it aint dead you ****** moron cuz PAVLIK didnt lost his titles in MIDDLEWEIGHT divison.

                  PACQUIAO s resume is one of the best.

                  Go look your idols FROID JR. s resume who didnt beat no one since robbery against CASTILLO.

                  He beat GATTI in light WW. Who was GATTI in LWW division?? NOBODY

                  JUDAH and BALDO in WW division?? BUMS Best guy was MARGARITO.

                  DE LA HOYA in LMW? Nobody, best guy was WINKY WRIGHT.

                  Comment

                  • jrosales13
                    undisputed champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 32632
                    • 739
                    • 763
                    • 40,023

                    #29
                    Originally posted by pbftxrs316
                    i don't see how manny could be considered a ww champ when he beat a guy at 145---it sickens me---well, it doesn't really---but what the hell---
                    How long have you been following boxing? There have doing catchweight for ever. Even titles has been on the line in catchweight bouts. And, it just sickens you now?

                    Comment

                    • pbftxrs316
                      Ellerbe's bum cleaner
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 4102
                      • 201
                      • 0
                      • 10,761

                      #30
                      Originally posted by baracuda
                      floyd's been cherrypickin his whole carrer.....
                      and how is that?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP