Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Joe Calzaghe's career - is it me or is just highly puzzling?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Sir Tom Jones View Post
    o dear.


    the hate on here is laughable. guessing you are 'grown ups'? yet you throw sissy fits over what a boxer from Wales did.
    Again this post shows clearly the level of ignorance shamelessly presented by these idiot fans of the fraud.


    Despite the poster clearly articulating the facts behind why Calzaghes career confuses him, presents his argument clinically he gets a nothing pointless reatrded guy like this answering back yet saying absolutely nothing.

    I see a lot of guys like this Tom Jones fool on here and all I can say is Tom you cretin, this is a forum, on forums people discuss and debate issues around the theme of the forum mate.

    If people do not discuss things like this here then what is the point in this forum.

    I think the issue is here is that the guy can not string 3 sentences together hence the short post.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by daggum View Post
      but he failed. he only tied the record of the great sven ottke who just did the same exact thing a couple years earlier. some accomplishment.
      What a joke that whole situation is. You have to **** bums claiming to have a record amount of defenses at the same time in the same division. It doesn't get more pathetic then that.

      Comment


      • #63
        the Pudwill fight was a late replacement.

        Comment


        • #64
          Come on..... Calzaghe said he was at an end just after the Kessler fight, so give him a break. He said he had a few fights left - Roy Jones and Hopkins were his choice and paid him good. He did what you want all fighters to, retire at his peak or when his time seems to be over.

          Comment


          • #65
            I think with Calzaghe's talents most people think he should be an ATG - however he left it till the end of his career before taking on the very best out there.

            Comment


            • #66
              Calzaghe is a skilled boxer, but his resume isnt that good. He should of tried to make a fight with Johnson,Pavlik and/or Dawson. I think his problem is the same problem that most Warren fighters have, they are overprotected.

              Comment


              • #67
                wow, good breakdown. first time I saw Calzaghe fight he was on the canvas against Byron Mitchell but he came back and won. That impressed me. But I didnt really think to much of him either until he beat Lacy. ATG? no. right place, right division, right time? totally

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by King_Lukas View Post
                  Again this post shows clearly the level of ignorance shamelessly presented by these idiot fans of the fraud.


                  Despite the poster clearly articulating the facts behind why Calzaghes career confuses him, presents his argument clinically he gets a nothing pointless reatrded guy like this answering back yet saying absolutely nothing.

                  I see a lot of guys like this Tom Jones fool on here and all I can say is Tom you cretin, this is a forum, on forums people discuss and debate issues around the theme of the forum mate.

                  If people do not discuss things like this here then what is the point in this forum.

                  I think the issue is here is that the guy can not string 3 sentences together hence the short post.
                  A fraud? Do behave.

                  You then go on to try and insult me

                  I have read the post. I just don't see where he is coming from. Should he have fought Sven Ottke? The guy who was getting a number of dubious decisions against opponents joe comfortably beat.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Sir Tom Jones View Post
                    A fraud? Do behave.

                    You then go on to try and insult me

                    I have read the post. I just don't see where he is coming from. Should he have fought Sven Ottke? The guy who was getting a number of dubious decisions against opponents joe comfortably beat.
                    Ottke would never fight outside of Germany, the only way Calzaghe would of won that fight in Germany would of been to shot him. And there is still a good chance that, that round would of been scored 10-8 to Ottke.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by SilverSamurai View Post
                      Ottke would never fight outside of Germany, the only way Calzaghe would of won that fight in Germany would of been to shot him. And there is still a good chance that, that round would of been scored 10-8 to Ottke.
                      Calzaghe could have battered him for 12 rounds and not get the decision.

                      Any sensible person knows Calzaghe beats Ottke hands down. Any sensible person would also know that fighting Ottke in Germany would almost certainly end up in a robbery. Ottke has a number of split decisions when he lost.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP