Originally posted by CrackYourJaw
View Post
Now since we are using the RING magazine titles to give Manny Pacquiao his 7th title in his 7th weight class, You guys should have no problem in using the RING Magazine rankings on top 10 fighters in the last decade to determine Who the Fighter of the ENTIRE Decade should be.
Year 2000:
Manny Pacquiao Not Even Ranked on the P4P List
Floyd Mayweather Ranked #2
Year 2001
Manny Pacquiao Not Ranked. Mayweather Ranked #2:
Year 2002:
Manny Pacquiao Not Ranked. Mayweather Ranked #5
Year 2003:
Manny Pacquiao Not Ranked. Mayweather Ranked #5
Year 2004:
Manny Pacquiao First apperance on the P4P List
Manny Pacquiao Ranked #5 Mayweather Ranked #2
Year 2005:
Manny Pacquiao Ranked #5 Mayweather Ranked #1
Year 2006:
Manny Pacquiao Ranked #2 Mayweather Ranked #1
Year 2007:
Manny Pacquiao Ranked #2 Mayweather Ranked #1
Year 2008:
Manny Pacquiao Ranked #2 (Until June, When Mayweather Retired). Mayweather Ranked #1
Year 2009:
Manny Pacquiao Ranked #1 Mayweather Ranked #2
Year 2010:
Pacquiao Just recently just got on the Pound for Pound list in 2004
when he has been a pro since 1995..
Floyd was Ranked on Ring Magazine's pound-for-pound list for TEN consecutive years. 10 years.
Pacquiao was has only been on there half of that time!
Floyd has spent Three and a half years Atop of that List: 2005,2006,2007, End Jun/2008 (retire)
1. 2005: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2005
2. 2006: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2006
3. 2007: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2007
4. 2008: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph...ne:_April_2008
Pacquiao has only spent 1 year 1/2ontop of that list..
2008:http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2008
If Pacquiao is the best fighter on this ENTIRE decade then how is it that for half of the decade he wasnt even ranked in the top 10?
While Mayweather has been at the TOP for the ENTIRE Decade!!!
Comment