Does Marquez have a better resume and legacy than Morales and Barrera?

[Iceta]

bradley is no good for jmm. i don't want to see that. juan diaz was overpowering jmm , i can't imagine what bradley would do.

jmm is best to go after hatton (for the money)

I thought this thread was about resumes. Is money gonna improve his resume? Hatton is fat and out of shape with no chin. JMM doesn't deserve any credit if he fights Hatton. I just said what JMM needed to do to make his resume better than Morales and Barrera's without question, and I don't think I can make it any more clear.

[Zarco]

you keep begging for an answer but it's staring you right in the face. look at their records and resume and if you're impartial you'll realize morales and barrera has better resumes.

i'll keep my answer short.

BEFORE MARQUEZ EVEN WON HIS FIRST WORLD TITLE , BARRERA AND MORALES WERE ALREADY CONSIDERED HOF-LEVEL FIGHTERS AND CALLED GREATS



who cares if people bag on a win over hatton? (if jmm can win , i think hatton is capable of beating jmm at 140 or above)

jmm will make a lot of money and secure himself and family financially.

see this thread has shown me that no body really has a clear answer. its just always "morales/barrera>marquez, its just the way it is".

your bolded answer to my question is ******. thats like me saying barrera/morales>pacquiao because they were already HOF'ers before any one even knew who pacquiao was.

[Castor_Troy]

LOL

No way!

[miron_lang]

see this thread has shown me that no body really has a clear answer. its just always "morales/barrera>marquez, its just the way it is".

your bolded answer to my question is ******. thats like me saying barrera/morales>pacquiao because they were already HOF'ers before any one even knew who pacquiao was.

Take a look at this list.

Morales-------Barrera------Marquez

Pacquiao(27)----Hamed-------Barrera(33)
Barrera ---------Morales--------Cassamayor(37)
Jones ----------McKinney-------J.Diaz
Chavez --------A. Sanchez----Medina
Zaragoza ------Tapia ----------Gainer
Chi --------------Salud ---------Juarez
Hernandez----- Ayala ----------Peden
McCullough----- Juarez ---------Salido
Ayala -----------Peden ----------Polo


----------1----------2----------3



Is that NOT Clear enough???

[Agave]

marquez already pass up Morales,,, currently he is a little step behind Barrera! If MARQUEZ fights Valero and beats him, he would be above both! Morales is tha only one out of them three to have QUIT like a COWARD! That puts him at the end.

[Left Hook Tua]

I thought this thread was about resumes. Is money gonna improve his resume? Hatton is fat and out of shape with no chin. JMM doesn't deserve any credit if he fights Hatton. I just said what JMM needed to do to make his resume better than Morales and Barrera's without question, and I don't think I can make it any more clear.

losing to bradley ain't helping his resume.

[miron_lang]

marquez already pass up Morales,,, currently he is a little step behind Barrera! If MARQUEZ fights Valero and beats him, he would be above both! Morales is tha only one out of them three to have QUIT like a COWARD! That puts him at the end.

What?

27 yr old Pacquiao
Prime Barrera


That 2 alone ****s on JMM's Resume

[Left Hook Tua]

see this thread has shown me that no body really has a clear answer. its just always "morales/barrera>marquez, its just the way it is".

your bolded answer to my question is ******. thats like me saying barrera/morales>pacquiao because they were already HOF'ers before any one even knew who pacquiao was.

listen.

the reason i wrote the bolded is to prove a point.

the fact that barrera and morales' resume was already considered HOF level BEFORE marquez even won his 1st title shows you how much better their resumes are than marquez.

are you really this simple?

people were ranking morales and barrera top 10 p4p 5-7 years before marquez even won a damn belt!



what do you want me to do? make a ****** list of all the guys they have already fought when your ass already knows who they fought?

just stfu already. 2/3 to 3/4 everyone on this damn site thinks barrera and morales were better. deal with it.

[Bretty Poy32]

zarco is the queen of spam

[Left Hook Tua]

zarco is the queen of spam

zarco is being a little ***** right now.

people give their opinion , he ignores it and pretends no one has given an explanation.

it's his only way of trying to prove that marquez is better because he knows it's not true.

in his dreams. he reminds me of the *******s in pacland that thinks pacquiao would beat sugar ray leonard.