Does Marquez have a better resume and legacy than Morales and Barrera?

[Zarco]

Whats to compare and contrast?

We seen those fights, live. We know who was what and why.


You're reliving those memories on youtube.

We saw Morales and Barrera go heads up in their primes, while JMM was toiling in obscurity.

thats not comparing and contrasting by using their resumes i provided. you are just an old timer that was a fan of those 2 before GBP grabbed a hold of JMM. by looking at their resumes, i want you to tell me how barrera and morales are in the skys, while marquez is on soil

casamayor was OLD. who knows how a prime morales and barrera could have handled an OLD casamayor

lol, and marquez was young?

So you're saying, even with the 3 knockdowns, you had Marquez winning that round.

that judge felt jmm deserved a 10-10 round.

jmm fans counting wins he doesn't officially have and wins in fights that never happened and using it as an excuse to vote yes.



i need a shot of tequila.......

excuse me pal but i started this argument on resumes, not hypothetical ****.

[Left Hook Tua]

lol, and marquez was young?



excuse me pal but i started this argument on resumes, not hypothetical ****.

boxing age. marquez though in his 30's , was still close to his best. he was #2 p4p for christ's sake. casamayor on the other hand wasn't very active , arguably lost to santa cruz and was getting beat up by katsidis. real age casamayor was only slightly older but boxing age casamayor was past it.



tell that to your buddies who keep bringing up hyphothetical wins for marquez and hypothetical losses for barrera and morales.

[talip bin osman]

I don't think so.

erik has the best among them IMO...

tackled death row level foes in succession & often winning...

he didnt have the gainers, the fanas, the victor polos during his reign...

oh i miss watching him...

[-MAKAVELLI-]

erik has the best among them IMO...

tackled death row level foes in succession & often winning...

he didnt have the gainers, the fanas, the victor polos during his reign...

oh i miss watching him...

green worthy post Talip

[oldgringo]

no. no he doesn't.

[Vasyl’s dad]

erik has the best among them IMO...

tackled death row level foes in succession & often winning...

he didnt have the gainers, the fanas, the victor polos during his reign...

oh i miss watching him...

[Bogig]

Heck No!

Barrera and Morales have much better resumes and will have greater legacies!

[Zarco]

boxing age. marquez though in his 30's , was still close to his best. he was #2 p4p for christ's sake. casamayor on the other hand wasn't very active , arguably lost to santa cruz and was getting beat up by katsidis. real age casamayor was only slightly older but boxing age casamayor was past it.



tell that to your buddies who keep bringing up hyphothetical wins for marquez and hypothetical losses for barrera and morales.

I dont know if you know this but Casamayor was always one of the slickest fighters in the game that went down a few times on flash KD's but never in any serious wars. 35yo JMM fought 37yo Casa. JMM had gotten into 2 wars with pac, 1 with barrera.

If you want to bash on a fighter's opponent because of "ring" age, then you better get talking pacquiao.

See its things like these that show me some one just does not like a fighter. Like when that lamer chicano activist trolled me for including certain names on JMM's resume, but he didnt touch Barreras or Morales's.

Time and time again I see pac fans that dont like JMM try and discredit his accomplishments by sayin he beat an old faded Barrera, beat a hyped feather fisted fighter that Campbell already beat, beat an old Casamayor. Thing is, 28yo Pac fought this old faded barrera right after 33yo Marquez beat him(pac got credit from pac fans). Pacquiao fought a majorly faded weight drained Morales right after Zahir Raheem beat him at the weight he wanted to fight pac at. Pac beat an old faded De la Hoya that Steve Forbes touched up pretty well right before, oh and i forgot to mention...he weighed 147 ON FIGHT NIGHT! I knew he was going to have trouble making a weight he hadnt made in 7 years, never did i imagine he was going to weigh that on FIGHT NIGHT! thats like Pacquiao fighting at bantam weight next.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

**** no!!!!!

[Left Hook Tua]

I dont know if you know this but Casamayor was always one of the slickest fighters in the game that went down a few times on flash KD's but never in any serious wars. 35yo JMM fought 37yo Casa. JMM had gotten into 2 wars with pac, 1 with barrera.

If you want to bash on a fighter's opponent because of "ring" age, then you better get talking pacquiao.

See its things like these that show me some one just does not like a fighter. Like when that lamer chicano activist trolled me for including certain names on JMM's resume, but he didnt touch Barreras or Morales's.

Time and time again I see pac fans that dont like JMM try and discredit his accomplishments by sayin he beat an old faded Barrera, beat a hyped feather fisted fighter that Campbell already beat, beat an old Casamayor.

Thing is, 28yo Pac fought this old faded barrera right after 33yo Marquez beat him(pac got credit by pac fans). Pacquiao fought a majorly faded weight drained Morales right after Zahir Raheem beat him at the weight he wanted to fight pac at. Pac beat an old faded De la Hoya that Steve Forbes touched up pretty well right before, oh and i forgot to mention...he weighed 147 ON FIGHT NIGHT! I knew he was going to have trouble making a weight he hadnt made in 7 years, never did i imagine he was going to weigh that on FIGHT NIGHT! thats like Pacquiao fighting at bantam weight next.

too long. hard for me to reply if you type DLT/Horus length posts. break them up.

1. are you trying to compare how many wars marquez has been in compared to casamayor? not trying to diss marquez but it is what it is. he fought a past it casamayor. still a great win but it doesn't change the fact casa was past it.

2. i never said erik morales was in his prime. i even say a past prime morales beat pacquiao.

3. no one gives pacquiao much credit for the barrera rematch. they give him credit for the 1st , which was one hell of a win. if someone is to blame for the barrera rematch happening too late don't blame pacquiao. i don't think pacquiao had any problems fighting barrera again. go talk to GBP and barrera about that. barrera got screwed over by gbp. gbp wanted him to fight jmm before pac.

4. stfu about pacquiao already. this is jmm vs. mab/em. look at the poll. look at who voted for jmm. jmm fans and a bunch alts and trolls.