Why does Calzaghe get bashed for fighting in Europe...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Marijuana
    Banned
    • Oct 2009
    • 658
    • 38
    • 23
    • 777

    #91
    Originally posted by Shattered Jaw
    Calzaghe fought an almost prime Hopkins. I would say Calzaghe was actually more out of prime than Hopkins and yet he still posted convincing scores

    Haha. Americans.

    Calzaghe > North American fighters.


    This is the type of inbred that we are arguing with here folks.

    By the way, I'm Ukrainian.

    Comment

    • Marijuana
      Banned
      • Oct 2009
      • 658
      • 38
      • 23
      • 777

      #92
      Originally posted by Chunk
      Some of them fights you've highlighted are amongst the worst decisions in Boxing history.
      It's missing, Dirrell-Froch

      Comment

      • Shattered Jaw
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 5131
        • 261
        • 141
        • 11,649

        #93
        Originally posted by OneEyeOpen
        He was 36, which if I did the math correctly, was 7 years younger than Hopkins.

        If he was so old, why was he fighting at all? To fool the public into believing he was great? So that 50 years from now people will look at his resume and say "Damn, he beat Hopkins and RJJ?"?

        You should really get over the whole "Why doesn't Slappy get any respect angle?" Calzaghe will never get respect because he fought hometown bums and only "stepped up" in his mid 30s vs. two guys that were 10 years past the time Calzaghe should have fought them.

        If Mayweather, with a resume of Corrales, Castillo 2x, DLH, Hatton, and Marquez, gets zero credit, do you really think a bum filled resume like Calzaghe deserves any credit?
        LMFAO.

        Hatton at 147 and DLH at 35 years old and after a decade of fighting a whos who of boxing are great wins (Ditto with Marquez who was like DLH except a stone overweight)? Get out of here.

        Cazaghe's destruction of Lacy and Kessler and SD of Hopkins is better than Floyd's entire resume combined.

        Comment

        • The Hammer
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 50797
          • 3,416
          • 8,704
          • 58,851

          #94
          Originally posted by OneEyeOpen
          I laugh at the ****s that say Calzaghe proved himself.

          He beat a 43 year old Bernard Hopkins by split decision.
          He beat a 39 year old Roy Jones by unanimous decision.
          Joe was old himself, close to the same age as Jones, but still managed to really dominate for 11 rounds.

          Hopkins was 43, but still very capable, as we saw in his next fight with Pavlik.

          Originally posted by OneEyeOpen
          He was put on his ass in the 1st round of both fights.
          The Jones kd wasn't a legal one, it was cause by a forearm to the bridge of the nose. The Hopkins kd was a clever but illegal punch-push combination, and so shouldn't have counted either.

          Originally posted by OneEyeOpen
          If this proves anything, it is that Calzaghe would of been proved average if he had actually fought the best in his prime.
          No, an average fighter wouldn't have wide decisions over prime Lacy, Kessler, and Eubank, nor KO wins over Mitchell, Sheika (who had just defeated Johnson) and Brewer.

          An average fighter wouldn't have been able to dominate even a past-prime Jones.

          Comment

          • Sir Tom Jones
            It's Not Unusual.
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 3493
            • 264
            • 582
            • 12,867

            #95
            Originally posted by OneEyeOpen
            If Mayweather, with a resume of Corrales, Castillo 2x, DLH, Hatton, and Marquez, gets zero credit, do you really think a bum filled resume like Calzaghe deserves any credit?
            Marquez at the weight he thought him deserves no credit.


            People give mayweather no credit because of the who he is and the fact that he hasn't chased or thought the best in his division.

            Comment

            • Oasis_Lad
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2005
              • 42674
              • 2,307
              • 4,087
              • 68,065

              #96
              OneEyeOpen, entire brain closed. What a tard.

              Comment

              • Marijuana
                Banned
                • Oct 2009
                • 658
                • 38
                • 23
                • 777

                #97
                Originally posted by Shattered Jaw
                LMFAO.

                Hatton at 147 and DLH at 35 years old and after a decade of fighting a whos who of boxing are great wins? Get out of here.

                Cazaghe's destruction of Lacy and Kessler and SD of Hopkins is better than Floyd's entire resume combined.
                OK, I called you an inbred, now I am going to call you a product of **** sex.

                You just discredited Mayweather's win vs. DLH because DLH was 35. Listen, ****sexual, Hopkins WAS 43, Jones WAS 39.

                Comment

                • Chunk..
                  Shot To ****!
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 32228
                  • 687
                  • 163
                  • 47,451

                  #98
                  Originally posted by OneEyeOpen
                  It's missing, Dirrell-Froch
                  One of the worst decisions in Boxing history? Not even close!

                  Comment

                  • Sir Tom Jones
                    It's Not Unusual.
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 3493
                    • 264
                    • 582
                    • 12,867

                    #99
                    Originally posted by OneEyeOpen
                    OK, I called you an inbred, now I am going to call you a product of **** sex.

                    You just discredited Mayweather's win vs. DLH because DLH was 35. Listen, ****sexual, Hopkins WAS 43, Jones WAS 39.

                    Everyone ages different tard face.

                    Comment

                    • Marijuana
                      Banned
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 658
                      • 38
                      • 23
                      • 777

                      #100
                      Originally posted by Carnivore
                      Joe was old himself, close to the same age as Jones, but still managed to really dominate for 11 rounds.

                      Hopkins was 43, but still very capable, as we saw in his next fight with Pavlik.


                      The Jones kd wasn't a legal one, it was cause by a forearm to the bridge of the nose. The Hopkins kd was a clever but illegal punch-push combination, and so shouldn't have counted either.



                      No, an average fighter wouldn't have wide decisions over prime Lacy, Kessler, and Eubank, nor KO wins over Mitchell, Sheika (who had just defeated Johnson) and Brewer.

                      An average fighter wouldn't have been able to dominate even a past-prime Jones.
                      What's Lacy's best win? Robin Reid? LOL. Did Eubank ever win another fight after fighting Slappy?

                      Kessler is a good win, a prime undefeated champion. Now add 3-5 more people like Kessler to your resume and you have a claim to ATG status. Without it, you record is filled with 40 year old Americans and Mario Veit's.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP