Why does everyone think old sschool boxers...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheGreatA
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 14143
    • 633
    • 271
    • 21,863

    #31
    Im still confused, if Pep could get away with it with his boxing skill, why would anyone think Floyd couldnt do the same. I dont think their is really any evidence to say a fighter of today wouldnt be able to do anything that was done in older times. Their all human.
    I didn't say Floyd couldn't do it. Read my post again:

    "If you had fragile hands as Floyd does, that basically meant you had to look for another sport than boxing. Or you just wouldn't sit down on your punches, much like Willie Pep didn't. He too had bad hands and broke them often."

    Some fighters today couldn't hang in the old times. Floyd is one of boxers who could but still, he would have problems with his hands, problems he could overcome because of his great boxing skill and ability to adapt, much like Pep.

    Anyone who thinks he wouldn't have problems with hand injuries fighting much more regularly and without the ability to pick and choose fights is not being realistic. He has problems with his hands even now and they affect his performances.

    Originally posted by Bhopreign
    Robinson would often threaten to pull out of a fight on the night of the fight if his monetarial demands werent met, he did this very often. He was notoriously known for being hard to deal with on a money basis. He wasnt the only one.
    Robinson was one of the few fighters who made a very good living out of the sport though and he did pay his dues early on in his career.

    In fact Robinson made enough money so that he could have fought less regularly but he thought fighting often kept his skills sharp.

    Comment

    • Jiddu Dali
      Banned
      • Aug 2009
      • 2938
      • 88
      • 62
      • 3,196

      #32
      Originally posted by Bhopreign
      Robinson would often threaten to pull out of a fight on the night of the fight if his monetarial demands werent met, he did this very often. He was notoriously known for being hard to deal with on a money basis. He wasnt the only one.
      yes this is a fact...Robinson was a Diva wayyyyyy before Mayweather was a diva

      Comment

      • TheGreatA
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 14143
        • 633
        • 271
        • 21,863

        #33
        Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
        yes this is a fact...Robinson was a Diva wayyyyyy before Mayweather was a diva
        I wouldn't call it being a "diva". Robinson hardly fought for millions and thought if he was going to get punched in the face, he might as well get paid for it.

        Arguing about opponents not being big enough PPV draws, getting 30 million instead of 40 and so on is being a diva.

        Comment

        • Bhopreign
          Banned
          • Jun 2006
          • 11273
          • 419
          • 100
          • 12,036

          #34
          Originally posted by TheGreatA
          I wouldn't call it being a "diva". Robinson hardly fought for millions and thought if he was going to get punched in the face, he might as well get paid for it.

          Arguing about opponents not being big enough PPV draws, getting 30 million instead of 40 and so on is being a diva.
          That sounds equivalent of Robinson in his day dont you think? I mean whats the difference.

          Comment

          • TheGreatA
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 14143
            • 633
            • 271
            • 21,863

            #35
            Originally posted by Bhopreign
            That sounds equivalent of Robinson in his day dont you think? I mean whats the difference.
            The difference is that Robinson was difficult to deal with because he wanted to get paid, not fight for a couple of dollars.

            I'm sure he would have been content on being paid millions even if his opponent was not a huge draw.

            Comment

            • BoxingChaos
              Ambiguous
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 4596
              • 311
              • 272
              • 11,182

              #36
              Originally posted by Alex.Hdz
              Why does everybody say old school boxers are automatically better than this age's boxers? Some say because they had stamina for 15 rounds...since the fights were 15 rounds, well thats bull****! If our fighters fought for 15 rounds they too would have the stamina for the 15 rounds.
              That is a big if. Some fighters of today can barely go 10. Jermain Taylor ring a bell?

              Not to mention that the old school fighters fought the real championship rounds, they also fought more often.

              Take my boy Archie Moore for example.

              won 185 (KO 131) + lost 23 (KO 7) + drawn 11 = 220
              rounds boxed 1477 KO% 59.55

              220 professional bouts son.

              The Divas of today not only fight less rounds, they fight a maximum of anywhere between 30 to 50 fights.

              Comment

              • The_Demon
                Big dog
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 13604
                • 1,354
                • 888
                • 22,971

                #37
                i think its the fact that alot of them had alot more heart and really had too earn their dues back then,hype didnt play as much of a part,it was all about what you did in the ring-too be the best you really had too beat the best,often repeatedly.

                Comment

                • Pullcounter
                  no guts no glory
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 42582
                  • 549
                  • 191
                  • 49,739

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Alex.Hdz
                  Why does everybody say old school boxers are automatically better than this age's boxers? Some say because they had stamina for 15 rounds...since the fights were 15 rounds, well thats bull****! If our fighters fought for 15 rounds they too would have the stamina for the 15 rounds.
                  because they fought more often, kept in better shape and had more skills...

                  Comment

                  • Glamour Puss
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 12516
                    • 456
                    • 270
                    • 15,684

                    #39
                    Of course they are better. They fought more, they were tougher, they had more heart and they didn't take time off like todays HBO bitches.

                    There's a reason boxing used to be a respected sport back then and why its a fringe sport now.

                    Its hilarious to think Floyd could compete w/ the badasses of yesterday, when he doesn't even fight the ones today.

                    When Floyd starts to fight guys his own size for at least 5 fights, get back to me.

                    Until then, he gets smashed.

                    Comment

                    • Sam D. Menace
                      Banned
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 700
                      • 28
                      • 29
                      • 849

                      #40
                      today it's harder fighting more round cuz most people are packin more muscle

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP