If Dirrel wouldn't had held so much, fell so much on his own and would had stopped complaining to the ref. he would had done a better job convincing that he won. IMO he won the fight but did himself no favors by doing what I mentioned. Froch chin even showed that its not resistant as it used to, when having a good chin is your defense it eventually crumbles
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Carl Froch: "Andre Dirrell Tried To Steal a Decision"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Shadows View PostSo you're saying every fighter should adopt the style of face first, hands down brawler?
Comment
-
Originally posted by FightDoctor. View PostWho ever said boxing is about standing and fighting. The greatest ran and set up there foes. Its about strategies, and skill. Froch is a straight ahead fighter, dirrell is a mover. It just two different styles.Also remember that in the last rounds dirrell stood with froch a couple times and froch couldn't hit him and dirrell hurt him 3 times and froch backed up . Old saying when ever you have a fighter going backwards that wants to come forward he's in trouble. dirrell didn't steal anything he took the win but those judges went with the home town hero.So who lost, froch did and you KNOW IT ,count his clean punches. I count 8 through the fight, dirrell , I count over 32 for dirrell . I'm talking about clean shots. landed punches dirrell wins. So froch is the *****.And kessler is going to be the Penis. Froch vs Kessler. Froch out by 8. Kessler wins by KO KO KO KTFO!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Freddy Krueger View PostSo is dirrell suppose to stand still and let Froch punch him? I don't think Carl Froch realizes what boxing is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by xAUGUSTUSx View PostSo because he finally stood and traded and with him in the last round and rocked him means he would've done it the whole fight? By that time Froch had been coming forward for 11 rounds so he was probably just a little thrown off by Dirrell.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TOBYLEE1 View PostIf Dirrel wouldn't had held so much, fell so much on his own and would had stopped complaining to the ref. he would had done a better job convincing that he won. IMO he won the fight but did himself no favors by doing what I mentioned. Froch chin even showed that its not resistant as it used to, when having a good chin is your defense it eventually crumbles
I think Froch was off balance from chasing and his wide swings that made him look more vulnerable to shots.
Dirrell did a good job at spoiling the fight, but fighting against any champ in his hometown doing what he did wouldn't have won him the fight.
Gotta give him credit though, he did more than Froch but the negative outweigh the positive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DreamSparkz View PostIf he didn't fall, clinch and run he would of been susceptible to being KO'd by Froch like many predicted the outcome would be, this is why he was fighting like he was.
I think Froch was off balance from chasing and his wide swings that made him look more vulnerable to shots.
Dirrell did a good job at spoiling the fight, but fighting against any champ in his hometown doing what he did wouldn't have won him the fight.
Gotta give him credit though, he did more than Froch but the negative outweigh the positive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View PostYou probably think Burton was beating Mayweather because he was forcing the fight.
Comment
Comment