Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Carl Froch: "Andre Dirrell Tried To Steal a Decision"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    If Dirrel wouldn't had held so much, fell so much on his own and would had stopped complaining to the ref. he would had done a better job convincing that he won. IMO he won the fight but did himself no favors by doing what I mentioned. Froch chin even showed that its not resistant as it used to, when having a good chin is your defense it eventually crumbles

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Shadows View Post
      So you're saying every fighter should adopt the style of face first, hands down brawler?
      No but If Dirrell is the better boxer than he should of used his boxing to keep Froch off of him. Like Kessler did to Andrade. There was no running in that fight. Kessler used his boxing to keep Andrade off of him and to keep him at a distance.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by FightDoctor. View Post
        Who ever said boxing is about standing and fighting. The greatest ran and set up there foes. Its about strategies, and skill. Froch is a straight ahead fighter, dirrell is a mover. It just two different styles.Also remember that in the last rounds dirrell stood with froch a couple times and froch couldn't hit him and dirrell hurt him 3 times and froch backed up . Old saying when ever you have a fighter going backwards that wants to come forward he's in trouble. dirrell didn't steal anything he took the win but those judges went with the home town hero.So who lost, froch did and you KNOW IT ,count his clean punches. I count 8 through the fight, dirrell , I count over 32 for dirrell . I'm talking about clean shots. landed punches dirrell wins. So froch is the *****.And kessler is going to be the Penis. Froch vs Kessler. Froch out by 8. Kessler wins by KO KO KO KTFO!
        So because he finally stood and traded and with him in the last round and rocked him means he would've done it the whole fight? By that time Froch had been coming forward for 11 rounds so he was probably just a little thrown off by Dirrell.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Freddy Krueger View Post
          So is dirrell suppose to stand still and let Froch punch him? I don't think Carl Froch realizes what boxing is.
          I guess he doesn't! He just wants to fight and had no idea just what kind of coward dirrell was gonna be in the ring! The kid has great skill but zero heart cuz if he wasn't scared to death of being hit he could have ko'd froch!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
            Carl Froch stole the decision, so I don't understand where he is getting at.
            What he said.............

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by xAUGUSTUSx View Post
              So because he finally stood and traded and with him in the last round and rocked him means he would've done it the whole fight? By that time Froch had been coming forward for 11 rounds so he was probably just a little thrown off by Dirrell.
              You probably think Burton was beating Mayweather because he was forcing the fight.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by TOBYLEE1 View Post
                If Dirrel wouldn't had held so much, fell so much on his own and would had stopped complaining to the ref. he would had done a better job convincing that he won. IMO he won the fight but did himself no favors by doing what I mentioned. Froch chin even showed that its not resistant as it used to, when having a good chin is your defense it eventually crumbles
                If he didn't fall, clinch and run he would of been susceptible to being KO'd by Froch like many predicted the outcome would be, this is why he was fighting like he was.

                I think Froch was off balance from chasing and his wide swings that made him look more vulnerable to shots.

                Dirrell did a good job at spoiling the fight, but fighting against any champ in his hometown doing what he did wouldn't have won him the fight.

                Gotta give him credit though, he did more than Froch but the negative outweigh the positive.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Freddy Krueger View Post
                  So is dirrell suppose to stand still and let Froch punch him? I don't think Carl Froch realizes what boxing is.
                  Boxing should be a turn based macho contest :P

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by DreamSparkz View Post
                    If he didn't fall, clinch and run he would of been susceptible to being KO'd by Froch like many predicted the outcome would be, this is why he was fighting like he was.

                    I think Froch was off balance from chasing and his wide swings that made him look more vulnerable to shots.

                    Dirrell did a good job at spoiling the fight, but fighting against any champ in his hometown doing what he did wouldn't have won him the fight.

                    Gotta give him credit though, he did more than Froch but the negative outweigh the positive.
                    A reasonable UK fan for a change. Yeah but i think where you fight shouldn't matter so much in a SPORT involving decade long careers and MILLIONS of dollars. This is why many fighters don't leave their homegrounds and we are left with 34282452 different champions for each weight class.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
                      You probably think Burton was beating Mayweather because he was forcing the fight.
                      No I don't Floyd was punching the **** out of him. But just the fact that you brought this up just shows that your just nothing but a Floyd fanboy. There is no point in me arguing with you because you'll always come back with the same old nonsense as usual. You obviously reward cowards! You have to realize that I'm not arguing that Froch is a better boxer because obviously Dirrell is the better boxer. Dirrell just never won the fight get over it. If Froch would've came there with that same mind set that Dirrell had then Froch would've won every round.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP