Carl Froch: "Andre Dirrell Tried To Steal a Decision"

[lyricalether]

[QUOTE=arnold_jasper;6429761]

I strongly disagree. Don't be deaf and blind. Look and think, in all boxing matches what most part of it that the audience love and like to see evidenced by loud applause and cheers. Is it not when fighters engage and fight. And what part the audience boooeos the fighters, when they don't fight because one of them is keep on running. Figth fans reaction speak for itselt what type of fight they love. This board does not represent the majority of the boxing lovers.

You do notice the fight was in Nottingham england right you ******? did you hear a single cheer in the crowd when Dirrell landed a 3 punch combination? or when wobbled froch? and how many cheers did you hear when froch came forward wildly swinging at air? exactly....go sit in the corner

[arnold_jasper]

You do notice the fight was in Nottingham england right you ******? did you hear a single cheer in the crowd when Dirrell landed a 3 punch combination? or when wobbled froch? and how many cheers did you hear when froch came forward wildly swinging at air? exactly....go sit in the corner

******, I am talking not about just that single fight, I'm talking about the audience reaction in all all boxing fights. Don't you even notice it? You deaf and blind.

[arnold_jasper]

Training takes a lot of heart to do right. Late night/morning road work sessions.. sparring with hungry opponents/ pushing limitations, and sacrificing your personal life for the mantra of the regimen. Plus this kid was undefeated..something like 15 fights in the pros... and a fairly extensive am career.. Your telling me he fought all those fights and never displayed any courage?

So is it your position that Dirrell did not fight at all in the Froch fight? He just ran the whole time? Didn't put any leather on Froch's face, or counter him in a pretty big way late in the fight?

I can see the viewpoint that Froch seemed to want the fight more. But, to say Dirrell didn't fight at all and didn't show some courage and heart in the final rounds is just..well, not smart.

Now you talk again training and conditioning. And what about it if you don't apply it in the ring. Show to the world the outcome of your training by figthing skilfully not by running skilfully. I don't care about how many fights dirrel won, we are not talking here about his previus fights. That's non-sense. The subject matter here is his performance against froch. Did he acted enough to win the fight? Definitely not. I know he has a skill, but his showing of skill against froch is not worthy of flying color. He hold and run too much. I agree to some that it could have been a draw because nobody deserve to win, but I understand the judges in giving froch the edge, maybe the agression factor although not effective because there's nothing to justify to give dirrel the victory.

[Sam D. Menace]

******, I am talking not about just that single fight, I'm talking about the audience reaction in all all boxing fights. Don't you even notice it? You deaf and blind.

you got owned....