Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Carl Froch: "Andre Dirrell Tried To Steal a Decision"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
    Ducking down, going to ground, holding on, running away constantly. This is the kind of thing you want to support in boxing?
    Not particularly. But I don't support blatant fouling with literally no consequence either.


    Originally posted by Weebler II
    If people are interviewing Froch to ask him what he thinks he's going to tell them what he thinks. It's nothing more than that, he won, he's still the (rightful) champion.
    lol.. C'mon. He could be nonchalant about it if he wanted to. Or he could say something like:

    "Our styles were so different, I just felt like it was an ugly clash of styles the other night. I wanted the fight more though, in my opinion, and I wholly agree with the decision. Dirrell, though, is very talented and has a bright future in boxing."

    You know..try to be a little gracious instead of pointing fingers like a guilty child that just ate all the cookies??

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Dan... View Post
      To all those responding to Weebler:

      When will you people learn? This man is a total fool and has provided evidence of it on countless occasions. Just ignore everything the moron says.
      Come on Dan... even major leaguers enjoy a bit of batting practice to easily knock some balls out of the park. The moron known as Weebler serves as the slow pitch to do so. I know I'm enjoying getting my home run count up.

      Comment


      • #33
        Well if Andre tried to steal the decision...

        Then what the **** did Froch try to do?

        Steal it at gun point?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
          Come on Dan... even major leaguers enjoy a bit of batting practice to easily knock some balls out of the park. The moron known as Weebler serves as the slow pitch to do so. I know I'm enjoying getting my home run count up.
          Just don't get to use to it or you will be in trouble when facing a live pitcher, although seeing a dead arm every once in a while can't hurt.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
            Lol, the only part of this I agree with is that Froch thinks he is still champion. It is natural for anyone who fought to think they win.

            I do think it's ironic that the guy who was hurt (Froch) thought that guy who wasn't hurt (Dirrell) didn't bring a fight to him at all. Trust me, the last thing I was thinking was that light puncher Dirrell was going to hurt Froch who has an iron chin (at least that is what you UK people have been lying to me about). I was worried for this bout in case Dirrell got knocked out, since he has had chin issues in the past, and Froch is the hardest puncher to ever live (according to unbiased UK fight fans), so... it's a bit surprising.
            I think you're taking what UK Froch fans say about his ability too much to heart. Froch wasn't hurt as far as I'm concerned, he went right after Dirrell as soon as he was hit, Dirrell had to hold on.

            Originally posted by Dan... View Post
            To all those responding to Weebler:

            When will you people learn? This man is a total fool and has provided evidence of it on countless occasions. Just ignore everything the moron says.
            zip it you plebian mungoball supportin chump

            Originally posted by Syf View Post
            Not particularly. But I don't support blatant fouling with literally no consequence either.
            I think the ref had sympathy with Froch, most of the rabbit punches came because Dirrell ducked almost to the floor. How else was he supposed to hit him? or should he have just chased him around in circles for 12 rounds. It's a pity the ref didn't deduct a point or two earlier on, we might've saw a real fight then.


            lol.. C'mon. He could be nonchalant about it if he wanted to. Or he could say something like:

            "Our styles were so different, I just felt like it was an ugly clash of styles the other night. I wanted the fight more though, in my opinion, and I wholly agree with the decision. Dirrell, though, is very talented and has a bright future in boxing."

            You know..try to be a little gracious instead of pointing fingers like a guilty child that just ate all the cookies??
            Why should be gracious for someone who tried to steal his title through dishonourable means? nah I'm with Froch, fk Dirrell for being a coward

            Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
            Come on Dan... even major leaguers enjoy a bit of batting practice to easily knock some balls out of the park. The moron known as Weebler serves as the slow pitch to do so. I know I'm enjoying getting my home run count up.
            all you do is wind yourself up and throw your toys out of the pram

            and rounders ****in sucks, stop talking about it like it's a proper sport
            Last edited by Weebler I; 10-21-2009, 02:18 AM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
              rofl @ all you fat yank idiots supporting a guy who runs away for 12 rounds and you call yourself fight fans? you're a ****in disgrace, nothing more, nothing less. Have a look at yourselves and think about what you're saying. You want boxing to turn into what Dirrell tried to make it?

              Dirrell was like a thieving shoplifter, one hit and then run like hell, and you want to reward this with titles?

              Boxing is an honourable sport, the sport of champions, the sport of warriors where the hours of dedication in training and bravery are demonstrated in a genuine contest. Let's not turn it into a cowardly farce.
              aren't you the moron that said that judah almost stopped cotto in the 1st round? how dare you talk about not knowing about boxing?

              Comment


              • #37
                1. Dirrell ran and caught Froch with 1-2 clean shots.

                2. for 2:30 of the rest of the round he ran and clinched so Carl couldn't get any punches off.

                Done this for 12 rounds, I don't know how he made Carl look like a fool when everyone could see Dirrell was the clown in the ring.

                When you turn your head or duck you expect to be hit, it's your own fault he knew what he was doing.

                - end

                Comment


                • #38
                  Be lucky that you got the decision penis. Carl Croch won at least 3-4 rounds tops. 115-112 shows me that boxing is still extremely f'ucced up. Clearly a home town decision. Those judges should be sentenced to drink piss for the rest of there lives.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Froch is making it like he lost by complaining or talking so much. Move on man the match is over

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I'm with Weebler and Dan!! Dirrell should have wrapped a big red bow around that fight before he gave it to Froch by running laps around the ring. I kept waiting for the fight to break out...
                      God knows, Froch did all he could to make it happen.

                      Can't wait to see him with Abraham!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP