Definitely Pacquiao-Marquez 4...after already beating him twice (should've really been three times if the judge in the first fight could add up correctly) and knocking him down multiple times, I thought Pacquiao had his number. Never in a million years would've I envisaged Marquez winning by brutal KO in the fourth.
The Great Nash has only ever been wrong once. That was Wilder's loss to Zhang, but fortunately for Nash, that 1 wrong was ruled a no-contest by Nash Rules, after Nash appealed his L due to it not being the real Wilder, but a clone of him. This was evidenced by a faulty right-hand trigger mechanism that locked during the fight, and also during the stoppage, where he (the clone) started facing the wrong way before Zhang stopped him. So, essentially, Nash has still never been wrong. Nash out - His Majesty
Definitely Pacquiao-Marquez 4...after already beating him twice (should've really been three times if the judge in the first fight could add up correctly) and knocking him down multiple times, I thought Pacquiao had his number. Never in a million years would've I envisaged Marquez winning by brutal KO in the fourth.
Marquez deserved the win in all four fights, you're on crack.
Comment