Comments Thread For: Joe Calzaghe named as the greatest fighter in British boxing history

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • archiemoore1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 3426
    • 1,771
    • 22
    • 21,278

    #121
    You're hurting right now. Go to the pub and have a beer and eat some b_ang_ers. You'll be alright. But you definitely don't know sh..t about boxing
    Last edited by archiemoore1; 10-09-2025, 08:32 PM.

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 48999
      • 4,922
      • 269
      • 104,043

      #122
      Originally posted by archiemoore1
      You're hurting right now. Go to the pub and have a beer and eat some b_ang_ers. You'll be alright. But you definitely don't know sh..t about boxing
      When you can answer the simple question then let me know, you clown.
      Last edited by IronDanHamza; 10-10-2025, 03:26 AM.

      Comment

      • Monty Fisto
        And still...
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2018
        • 3441
        • 1,467
        • 855
        • 22,690

        #123
        Originally posted by 1Eriugenus
        How was he obviously much better than Hatton when Hatton’s best win, Tszyu, eclipses anything Joe achieved? You have, presumably, either forgotten or never heard of Ken Buchanan, Lloyd Honeyghan and Prince Naseem. I can say any of them, at their peak, were better P4P than Joe. Ken and Lloyd had very short periods when they were at their best, but their performances in those brief periods absolutely eclipse anything Joe ever did. As for Prince Naseem, people forget how good he was and remember only how much of a complete **** he came over as
        As I said, it's difficult to compare across eras. I used to love watching Lloyd Honeyghan as a kid and he had a few solid gold performances. I remember watching live when he bum rushed Bumphus, for instance. But that doesn't match what Calzaghe did over his career -- or the level of superiority of skill that Calzaghe used to demonstrate over his opponents. Prince Naseem had great reflexes and great punching power for his weight. It's more for how he got found out at the technique level or for his unwillingness to train properly that "people forget how good he was" rather than just for how much of a tit he was. As for Hatton, yes, he had a great win against Tszyu. And then was found subsequently wanting in a succession of fights within a few years in a way that we never saw with Calzaghe. If the discussion was who had the better individual win I could see why you were bringing this fight to the table. Not quite sure why a single fight should skew things so much though.

        As for Buchanan, the better part of his career was more than 50 years ago. Didn't I cover that in what I said? How many times did you watch Buchanan fight when he was active?
        Last edited by Monty Fisto; 11-21-2025, 04:43 PM.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP