Canelo sucks, Mayweather sucks, Wilder Sucks, Joshua Su....what is it with boxing fans these days?

[TheProudLunatic]

Boxing "fans" suck

[Quiksilva]

You can't please everyone. It's simple. You just can't. No one is ever truly satisfied.

[TMLT87]

Online discourse skews negative for just about everything imo, not just boxing. No idea why. Maybe its just easier to generate conversation by talking ****.

[Bennyleonard99]

Bud has fought spence whos prime was left on the dashboard of his car and Canelo who has been on a major decline and went life and death with John Ryder...not to mention he was schooled by Lara years ago..beaten by GGG twice in most eyes and previously dominated in a much less competitive fashion by Mayweather and Bivol than Bud did..

This is choreographed greatness and the afro americans and casuals are lapping it up putting him above past way more deserving fighters

Good points for sure. Canelo certainly overrated and protected with set ups and hired patsies. Crawford beat a shell of a fraud and has now been installed to goatness. If he ducks Alimkhanuly your analysis is strongly supported. Alimkhanuly is the only real fight out there for Bud right now, everything else is business

[Nash out]

i dont think he will be reading...mind bobbling if he is though

All the pro boxers and the likes of Eddie Hearn read everything on here to check what The Great Nash is saying and responding to. Nash out - His Majesty

[Stuntman Mike]

And yet he defeated title holders and top 20 ranked fighters, knocked down a future HOFer in Fury. There is no way most fighters ever get anywhere near that. had to be something he was doing. At any given time during his peak there were probably a couple thousand professional heavyweight boxers in the world, at most only a handful were better than him. That puts him better than 99%

If he won because his size and reach, then I guess thats a factor that allows someone to win boxing matches, doesnt make him any less because of it. We don't get to say that only fighters who win the ways we like get to be good, as long as he won within the rules then it counts.


And yes he was athletic, he had excellent strength, speed, and body composition, all of which counts towards athleticism.

He fought bums and when he finally stepped up he was taken to school and given ungodly beatings

Fury was a shell of himself in the first fight with the massive lay off and weight loss

You seriously think Wilder was some sort of legend in boxing???

Hes was a manufactured champion and all the hype the media built up around him was for money making reasons nothing else.

People still think Fury beating Wilder was up there with Ali beating Foreman are just imbeciles.

[DeeMoney]

He fought bums and when he finally stepped up he was taken to school and given ungodly beatings

Fury was a shell of himself in the first fight with the massive lay off and weight loss

You seriously think Wilder was some sort of legend in boxing???

Hes was a manufactured champion and all the hype the media built up around him was for money making reasons nothing else.

People still think Fury beating Wilder was up there with Ali beating Foreman are just imbeciles.

Are you being serious? Are you just straw manning me to mess around? You understand the premise of this thread right, and have read my posts?

Where did I imply he was "some sort of legend"?

The idea of this thread is how boxing fans complain that top tier boxers, "suck". And how they whine about the best fighters in the world. One poster argued that Wilder '******', to which I pointed out at his prime he was better than 99% of the active heavyweights in the world.

Explain to me how that means I was implyig he was a legend?

[DeeMoney]

a guy who had never boxed before did that lol and that same guy fought fury closer!

So just to clarify, during his prime you feel that there were 40+ active heavyweights who would consistently beat Wilder in the ring if they fought?

[Coverdale]

Are you being serious? Are you just straw manning me to mess around? You understand the premise of this thread right, and have read my posts?

Where did I imply he was "some sort of legend"?

The idea of this thread is how boxing fans complain that top tier boxers, "suck". And how they whine about the best fighters in the world. One poster argued that Wilder '******', to which I pointed out at his prime he was better than 99% of the active heavyweights in the world.

Explain to me how that means I was implyig he was a legend?

So just to clarify, during his prime you feel that there were 40+ active heavyweights who would consistently beat Wilder in the ring if they fought?

The simpletons you are responding to are incapable of any sort of nuanced discussion. I suggest putting them on ignore.