Who has had the better pro career: Lomachenko or Usyk?

[Boxing 112]

How do you see it?

Is is tough to decide or is it fairly one sided?

This proves my point that i have made about Loma being over rated. Loma is over rated and what people made out Loma is, is what Usyk is. The guy has lost 3 fights. Lost his 2 biggest fights vs Haney and Teo. Never fought Shakur. Why do we even keep hyping a guy an ATG who never even proved himself best of his generation. Lomas hype is because the great promo machine he had behind him and the 396-1 amateur record they love pushing that no one can actually prove. Is he world class, yes, one of the best, yes, but over rated in terms of how he is looked at, 100%.

[dan_cov]

Usyk by far. Loma had a good but underwhelming career really, Usyk a great career.

Usyk turned out to be what Loma fans was hyping Loma up to be.

[ShoulderRoll]

Usyk and I don’t think it’s really even a discussion.

Loma’s career was messed up by Arum. For example he could’ve unified at FW by beating Nicholas Walters when they were the clear 2 best FW’s in the world.

Instead Arum sat Walters for a year and Loma ended up beating him at 130 which meant little in terms of history.

Usyk, ad mentioned above, cleaned out 2 divisions by defeating the best men in both.

Yeah, I didn’t like how Arum sat Walters for a year. That was bullcrap.

They also never made the Mikey Garcia fight which would have been huge for legacy.

[ShoulderRoll]

What? Lmao..... Nobody would fight him and the whole world knows he beat Haney. Salido would never fight him again and almost got stopped weighing probably 20 pounds heavier on fight night. Don't get me started on Lopez. These guys manipulated everything they could to stay away from.

He was the most feared fighter. You guys are into the culture wayyy to heavy.

Do you think Lomachenko had the better pro career?