Who has had the better pro career: Lomachenko or Usyk?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lomadeaux
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2017
    • 7658
    • 848
    • 120
    • 133,607

    #21
    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

    Lomachenko certainly didn’t have a bad career, but I think more was expected. Maybe if he had stayed at 130 lbs instead of moving up he would have been more dominant?

    You say the heavier weights limit opposition, but Usyk is beating much bigger and stronger world champions.
    To be honest, I completely agree. But he beat Haney, and beat the hell out of Lopez. They're Tank-like-cowards of the new era.
    Last edited by Lomadeaux; 08-12-2025, 06:46 PM.

    Comment

    • Leebrond
      Amateur
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Mar 2025
      • 21
      • 2
      • 2
      • 0

      #22
      For me, it felt tricky at first, kind of like when I joined a course where During the program, students learn how to establish their own business. At first, all the options seemed equal, but as I went through it, the differences became clear. Once you see how each choice actually plays out in practice, it usually tips one way or the other pretty naturally.
      Last edited by Leebrond; 12-22-2025, 09:30 AM.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP