Pacquiao - Tank fight rumor is true

[IronDanHamza]

how do i know what??? big dunn already said it himself in the other thread!! big dunn did not provide any reasons as to why he think manny will win, where as for jeff, jeff said manny's experience alone will be the key to his victory over barrios... and big dunn first said pac has no chance against barrios, then big dunn changed his stance to now saying manny will win but offer nothing to back up why he feels that way. big dunn also then said when manny wins, they should set up a fight with manny vs boots, then he later admitted that he wants that match up because he wants to see manny get hurt! so how do you take someone like him serious??

How do you know Jeff doesn't have an agenda? You're just asserting that he doesn't. I'd argue he probably does, especially when I'd like to think he isn't dumb enough to actually think Pacquaio has any kind of chance of beating Barrios and especially Tank.

I've never seen Big Dunn say Barrios would beat Pacquaio. All I've seen him say is Barrios has no chance vs Pacquaio. Which is silly, much like I think Jeff's views here are.

For the record I don't take either of these opinions serious, Dunn's or Jeff's. My view is they're both being overtly disingenuous with an obvious agenda against Pacquaio and putting him in a no win situation despite the fact they know full well he's getting badly hurt should he fight either of those fighters.

[STREET CLEANER]

This is going to be a vicious circle. Barrios is going to do what he did to Ugas what Ugas did to Pac.

[IceTrayDaGang]

How do you know Jeff doesn't have an agenda? You're just asserting that he doesn't. I'd argue he probably does, especially when I'd like to think he isn't dumb enough to actually think Pacquaio has any kind of chance of beating Barrios and especially Tank.

I've never seen Big Dunn say Barrios would beat Pacquaio. All I've seen him say is Barrios has no chance vs Pacquaio. Which is silly, much like I think Jeff's views here are.

For the record I don't take either of these opinions serious, Dunn's or Jeff's. My view is they're both being overtly disingenuous with an obvious agenda against Pacquaio and putting him in a no win situation despite the fact they know full well he's getting badly hurt should he fight either of those fighters.

i already explained this in my previous post! what agenda does Jeff has? you said he's only saying that because he's floyd uncle. so i asked you if that's the case then why didnt floyd sr and roger sugar Manny then? isnt roger floyd's uncle also? then i said maybe Jeff knows more than you. Floyd sr and roger has always diss manny and say pac is one dimensional.

Big dunn liked a post who says manny has no chance against barrios, this was early on when the fight first got announced. im not the smartest guy but when you liked a post, doesnt that means that you agreed with it??????? Dunn has an agenda. now he's saying Manny will win but provides no explanation, which is why i called him out saying that he's only saying this so when Manny wins, he can downplay the win, saying that barrios was no good... why do i feel that way? because big dunn has already came out and said, manny came back and picked the easier champ in the WW division. and then goes and and said that he would have prefer manny vs boots instead.

[IceTrayDaGang]

How do you know Jeff doesn't have an agenda? You're just asserting that he doesn't. I'd argue he probably does, especially when I'd like to think he isn't dumb enough to actually think Pacquaio has any kind of chance of beating Barrios and especially Tank.

I've never seen Big Dunn say Barrios would beat Pacquaio. All I've seen him say is Barrios has no chance vs Pacquaio. Which is silly, much like I think Jeff's views here are.

For the record I don't take either of these opinions serious, Dunn's or Jeff's. My view is they're both being overtly disingenuous with an obvious agenda against Pacquaio and putting him in a no win situation despite the fact they know full well he's getting badly hurt should he fight either of those fighters.

here is some post from dunn,,

in a post where the TS said this fight is going to be like duran vs joppy (in which duran took a beating)

I agree. This fight is a waste.

in that same thread, dunn goes back and quote that same post with this reply --

I get Duran-Joppy vibes.

Stay retired Manny.

Looks like you’re getting it.

in that same thread, dunn express how he would prefer manny vs boots --

I would prefer Manny v Boots. Give a credible young champ a boost in profile.

in another thread, dunn explains why he wants to see manny vs boots, while also saying that he doesnt view manny highly like i do, so why is he picking pac to all of a sudden beat barrios then??? because he has an agenda! --

Yes, I want to see Manny ko’d. So?

You just want me to think as highly of Manny as you do. I never will. He isn’t a deity.
.

more post from dunn in that same thread --

Boots ko win over Manny uplifts the sport.

Yes, I want him to fight the best ww. That he could get KO’d would be fine with me. That is what I will be rooting for should it happen.

No you’re here because you’re a sensitive, Manny pole smoking stan that got triggered by my post.

You’re very angry for some reason. Oh yeah, because I want to see a boxer kod. Lmfao.

here's dunn downplaying Barrios now.. stating that barrios is not top tier, which again goes back to my point that if manny wins, dunn will say barrios was not good --

Not beating Barrios. If this was a top tier ww like Boots, ok.

This wouldn’t be Foreman over Moorer.

Do I prefer Manny fighting Boots instead of Barrios? Yes because Barrios is a bum with no chance to win and Boots is probably the best ww in the world who likely knocks Manny out.

then a poster reminded dunn that barrios is ranked #2..

I didn’t realize Barrios was #2. I guess as the wbc champ he has to be. Yuck.

I agree with your points here.

Big dunn first agreed with another poster saying this fight will be like duran vs joppy...

then after pac fans started making threads that if manny beats barrios, it will be one of the greatest victory in boxing history being that pac is 46.

so now big dunn goes back on his words and try to discredit barrios now, so that if manny wins, it wouldnt be seen as a huge accomplishment.

Dunn has an agenda!!!

[QueensburyRules]

- - Dumberest thread of the year.

DeEvolution at it's finest...

[Grandma Lover]

Tank sells the most ppvs from 135-154 so I can see why this is being talked about should Manny beat Barrios, which I expect.

I guess this would be a huge selling fight.

All Tank will do is get criticized for it and get a huge bag.

IMO he’d be better off fighting a LW like Loma or a JWW like Teo.

Whaaaat they actually banned this racist AND bodybagz?

This site ain't that bad

[IronDanHamza]

i already explained this in my previous post! what agenda does Jeff has? you said he's only saying that because he's floyd uncle. so i asked you if that's the case then why didnt floyd sr and roger sugar Manny then? isnt roger floyd's uncle also? then i said maybe Jeff knows more than you. Floyd sr and roger has always diss manny and say pac is one dimensional.

Big dunn liked a post who says manny has no chance against barrios, this was early on when the fight first got announced. im not the smartest guy but when you liked a post, doesnt that means that you agreed with it??????? Dunn has an agenda. now he's saying Manny will win but provides no explanation, which is why i called him out saying that he's only saying this so when Manny wins, he can downplay the win, saying that barrios was no good... why do i feel that way? because big dunn has already came out and said, manny came back and picked the easier champ in the WW division. and then goes and and said that he would have prefer manny vs boots instead.

But again, you don't know whether or not Jeff has an agenda.

You're just asserting that he doesn't because it suits the outcome you want. He could easily have one. We don't know.

[IronDanHamza]

here is some post from dunn,,

in a post where the TS said this fight is going to be like duran vs joppy (in which duran took a beating)



in that same thread, dunn goes back and quote that same post with this reply --





in that same thread, dunn express how he would prefer manny vs boots --



in another thread, dunn explains why he wants to see manny vs boots, while also saying that he doesnt view manny highly like i do, so why is he picking pac to all of a sudden beat barrios then??? because he has an agenda! --



more post from dunn in that same thread --





here's dunn downplaying Barrios now.. stating that barrios is not top tier, which again goes back to my point that if manny wins, dunn will say barrios was not good --





then a poster reminded dunn that barrios is ranked #2..




Big dunn first agreed with another poster saying this fight will be like duran vs joppy...

then after pac fans started making threads that if manny beats barrios, it will be one of the greatest victory in boxing history being that pac is 46.

so now big dunn goes back on his words and try to discredit barrios now, so that if manny wins, it wouldnt be seen as a huge accomplishment.

Dunn has an agenda!!!

Again, don't disagree with that. I think he does have an agenda on this occasion.

I think Jeff does too because there is no way he actually thinks Pacquaio has any kind of chance vs Tank, in my opinion.

[IceTrayDaGang]

But again, you don't know whether or not Jeff has an agenda.

You're just asserting that he doesn't because it suits the outcome you want. He could easily have one. We don't know.

what would that be tho??? because you imply that he's only saying that because he's floyd's uncle but floyd sr and roger never sugar coat manny just because they are related to floyd.... i think out of the mayweathers, jeff is the one who is actually fair and give an honest opinion. jeff is the one that doesnt get caught up in the drama. he tells it like how he see's it.. when during the height of the floyd/pac drama, jeff never really bad mouth manny. jeff always gave a fair opinion when he feels that manny will lose or win, he gives an explanation as to why he feels that way.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Again, don't disagree with that. I think he does have an agenda on this occasion.

I think Jeff does too because there is no way he actually thinks Pacquaio has any kind of chance vs Tank, in my opinion.

i honestly feel pac has a better chance at winning against tank than he has against barrios!! bruh, tank is the same size as manny, if not even smaller!! pac eats these type of fighters up! manny's experience alone will be too much for tank. i cant see anything that tank does that will give manny issues. but with barrios, all the advantage is on barrios side... where as for tank, he doesnt have anything that will give manny problems, imo. it will be very similar to pac vs broner.