This is going to be a vicious circle. Barrios is going to do what he did to Ugas what Ugas did to Pac.
Pacquiao - Tank fight rumor is true
Collapse
-
-
How do you know Jeff doesn't have an agenda? You're just asserting that he doesn't. I'd argue he probably does, especially when I'd like to think he isn't dumb enough to actually think Pacquaio has any kind of chance of beating Barrios and especially Tank.
I've never seen Big Dunn say Barrios would beat Pacquaio. All I've seen him say is Barrios has no chance vs Pacquaio. Which is silly, much like I think Jeff's views here are.
For the record I don't take either of these opinions serious, Dunn's or Jeff's. My view is they're both being overtly disingenuous with an obvious agenda against Pacquaio and putting him in a no win situation despite the fact they know full well he's getting badly hurt should he fight either of those fighters.
Big dunn liked a post who says manny has no chance against barrios, this was early on when the fight first got announced. im not the smartest guy but when you liked a post, doesnt that means that you agreed with it??????? Dunn has an agenda. now he's saying Manny will win but provides no explanation, which is why i called him out saying that he's only saying this so when Manny wins, he can downplay the win, saying that barrios was no good... why do i feel that way? because big dunn has already came out and said, manny came back and picked the easier champ in the WW division. and then goes and and said that he would have prefer manny vs boots instead.Last edited by IceTrayDaGang; 06-18-2025, 08:32 AM.Comment
-
How do you know Jeff doesn't have an agenda? You're just asserting that he doesn't. I'd argue he probably does, especially when I'd like to think he isn't dumb enough to actually think Pacquaio has any kind of chance of beating Barrios and especially Tank.
I've never seen Big Dunn say Barrios would beat Pacquaio. All I've seen him say is Barrios has no chance vs Pacquaio. Which is silly, much like I think Jeff's views here are.
For the record I don't take either of these opinions serious, Dunn's or Jeff's. My view is they're both being overtly disingenuous with an obvious agenda against Pacquaio and putting him in a no win situation despite the fact they know full well he's getting badly hurt should he fight either of those fighters.
in a post where the TS said this fight is going to be like duran vs joppy (in which duran took a beating)
in that same thread, dunn goes back and quote that same post with this reply --
in that same thread, dunn express how he would prefer manny vs boots --
more post from dunn in that same thread --
here's dunn downplaying Barrios now.. stating that barrios is not top tier, which again goes back to my point that if manny wins, dunn will say barrios was not good --
then a poster reminded dunn that barrios is ranked #2..
Big dunn first agreed with another poster saying this fight will be like duran vs joppy...
then after pac fans started making threads that if manny beats barrios, it will be one of the greatest victory in boxing history being that pac is 46.
so now big dunn goes back on his words and try to discredit barrios now, so that if manny wins, it wouldnt be seen as a huge accomplishment.
Dunn has an agenda!!!
Last edited by IceTrayDaGang; 06-18-2025, 08:54 AM.Comment
-
-
Tank sells the most ppvs from 135-154 so I can see why this is being talked about should Manny beat Barrios, which I expect.
I guess this would be a huge selling fight.
All Tank will do is get criticized for it and get a huge bag.
IMO he’d be better off fighting a LW like Loma or a JWW like Teo.
This site ain't that badComment
-
i already explained this in my previous post! what agenda does Jeff has? you said he's only saying that because he's floyd uncle. so i asked you if that's the case then why didnt floyd sr and roger sugar Manny then? isnt roger floyd's uncle also? then i said maybe Jeff knows more than you. Floyd sr and roger has always diss manny and say pac is one dimensional.
Big dunn liked a post who says manny has no chance against barrios, this was early on when the fight first got announced. im not the smartest guy but when you liked a post, doesnt that means that you agreed with it??????? Dunn has an agenda. now he's saying Manny will win but provides no explanation, which is why i called him out saying that he's only saying this so when Manny wins, he can downplay the win, saying that barrios was no good... why do i feel that way? because big dunn has already came out and said, manny came back and picked the easier champ in the WW division. and then goes and and said that he would have prefer manny vs boots instead.
You're just asserting that he doesn't because it suits the outcome you want. He could easily have one. We don't know.Last edited by IronDanHamza; 06-22-2025, 12:10 PM.Comment
-
here is some post from dunn,,
in a post where the TS said this fight is going to be like duran vs joppy (in which duran took a beating)
in that same thread, dunn goes back and quote that same post with this reply --
in that same thread, dunn express how he would prefer manny vs boots --
in another thread, dunn explains why he wants to see manny vs boots, while also saying that he doesnt view manny highly like i do, so why is he picking pac to all of a sudden beat barrios then??? because he has an agenda! --
more post from dunn in that same thread --
here's dunn downplaying Barrios now.. stating that barrios is not top tier, which again goes back to my point that if manny wins, dunn will say barrios was not good --
then a poster reminded dunn that barrios is ranked #2..
Big dunn first agreed with another poster saying this fight will be like duran vs joppy...
then after pac fans started making threads that if manny beats barrios, it will be one of the greatest victory in boxing history being that pac is 46.
so now big dunn goes back on his words and try to discredit barrios now, so that if manny wins, it wouldnt be seen as a huge accomplishment.
Dunn has an agenda!!!
I think Jeff does too because there is no way he actually thinks Pacquaio has any kind of chance vs Tank, in my opinion.Comment
-
what would that be tho??? because you imply that he's only saying that because he's floyd's uncle but floyd sr and roger never sugar coat manny just because they are related to floyd.... i think out of the mayweathers, jeff is the one who is actually fair and give an honest opinion. jeff is the one that doesnt get caught up in the drama. he tells it like how he see's it.. when during the height of the floyd/pac drama, jeff never really bad mouth manny. jeff always gave a fair opinion when he feels that manny will lose or win, he gives an explanation as to why he feels that way.Comment
-
i honestly feel pac has a better chance at winning against tank than he has against barrios!! bruh, tank is the same size as manny, if not even smaller!! pac eats these type of fighters up! manny's experience alone will be too much for tank. i cant see anything that tank does that will give manny issues. but with barrios, all the advantage is on barrios side... where as for tank, he doesnt have anything that will give manny problems, imo. it will be very similar to pac vs broner.Comment
-
what would that be tho??? because you imply that he's only saying that because he's floyd's uncle but floyd sr and roger never sugar coat manny just because they are related to floyd.... i think out of the mayweathers, jeff is the one who is actually fair and give an honest opinion. jeff is the one that doesnt get caught up in the drama. he tells it like how he see's it.. when during the height of the floyd/pac drama, jeff never really bad mouth manny. jeff always gave a fair opinion when he feels that manny will lose or win, he gives an explanation as to why he feels that way.
For him to publicly say that Pacquaio could beat any ranked fighter at this moment in time makes me believe he must have an agenda, let alone Tank.Comment
Comment