Just rewatched the fight? - post scorecards here

[Dynamite Kid]

R1 Froch
R2 Dirrell
R3 Froch
R4 Dirrell
R5 Froch
R6 Froch
R7 Dirrell
R8 Froch
R9 Froch
R10 Even 9-9
R11 Dirrell
R12 Dirrell

114 - 113 Froch. However a draw, or a one point win for Dirrell could be argued. I was in the arena with a good view last night, so I have experienced this fight from two perspectives.

One thing that was apparent straight away, was Showtimes biased commentary. Froch landed quite a lot of jabs and inside punches that were ignored and not commented on. On top of this when Dirrell landed they were making a big deal out of soft jabs that barely knocked Froch's head back. Also Froch landed quite a few counter shots in exchanges that went unnoticed, while Dirrells were exuberantly praised.

There were a lot of close and hard fought rounds in this fight, and a few could have gone either way, but I still don't think Dirrell warranted the decision. He spoiled all night because he didn't want to get caught up in the exchanges. Froch had Dirrell on the back foot for 10 out of 12 rounds, and landed enough of his own punches, and worked enough on the inside to win the fight. I don't see Froch's win as a controversial decision. Two of the judges score cards were definitely a little wide, but the correct fighter won.

You obviously have no idea how to score a fight to score that fight for Froch, your an embarrassment. Who lands!!! the more effective blows round by round is how a fight is scored, that clearly was not Froch.

Biased ****!

[Crazylegs77]

No way I will rewatch that garbage.

I watched the figh closely the first time and went back over my card,changed the score to the first 3 rounds even and had Froch up by 1 with the point deduction. It should have been a draw in reality.

[BetterCallSaul]

You obviously have no idea how to score a fight to score that fight for Froch, your an embarrassment. Who lands!!! the more effective blows round by round is how a fight is scored, that clearly was not Froch.

Biased ****!

Dirrell only landed strong, decisive blows in about 4 seperate rounds. Apart from that he hardly did anything. I suggest you watch the fight again.

[Dynamite Kid]

Dirrell only landed strong, decisive blows in about 4 seperate rounds. Apart from that he hardly did anything. I suggest you watch the fight again.

You need to watch the fight again, he was painting Froch's face with hard shots in the last 2 rounds, he also hurt him towards the end so you are obviously talking out your arse, on the flip side you could not favour what Froch was doing over Dirrell's work because he wasn't landing **** all!!!

Get a clue son.

[masta]

I scored it 115-111 in favor of Dirrell.

[dom800]

im usually very accurate at scorings.

Round 1 Froch
Round 2 Froch
Round 3 Froch
Round 4 Froch
Round 5 Froch
Round 6 Froch
Round 7 Froch
Round 8 Froch
Round 9 Froch
Round 10 Even due to point deduction
Round 11 Dirrell
Round 12 Froch (Dirrell was winning till he started to run away again late in the round)


Score:118 Froch 109 Dirrell


Close fight, but Froch wanted it more. As evident by him throwing more,landing more and being much more aggressive.

Dirrell held Froch too much, and he wasnt active enough to win the fight. He was just running and waiting to land a big shot to ko Froch, which is very unlikely to happen... Dirrell is talented, but he got his tactics all wrong.


I watched the fight on my computer with the showtime commentators, who were heavily biased towards Dirrell. commenting on him landing a harmless counter punch right after froch threw 3-5 punches at him.

Basically you cant win rounds by only landing a few good punches and running for the rest of the round. Thats why i gave most of the rounds to Froch.

[dom800]

This is the first time I have tried to score a full fight so don't mock me please

10 9 Froch
10 9 Froch
10 9 Froch
9 10 Dirrell
9 10 Dirrell
10 9 Froch
10 9 Froch
10 9 Froch
10 9 Froch
9 9 EVEN point decution
9 10 Dirrell
9 10 Dirrell

115 - 112 FROCH

Man, that Dirrell is one whiny, holding ***** with running shoes on. He brought shame on the USA. Froch is very clumsy and slow but at least he tries to make a fight.

PS! I don't like Froch. I don't like disrespectful boxers.

This, i see some posters make sense like the one above, other poster have posted ridiculously biased scorecards to Dirrell.

[swizz]

You can't have a 9 - 9 round.

One fighter has to have a 10.

u could have it9-9 if the fighter was deducted a point in the round he won

[swizz]

im usually very accurate at scorings.

Round 1 Froch
Round 2 Froch
Round 3 Froch
Round 4 Froch
Round 5 Froch
Round 6 Froch
Round 7 Froch
Round 8 Froch
Round 9 Froch
Round 10 Even due to point deduction
Round 11 Dirrell
Round 12 Froch (Dirrell was winning till he started to run away again late in the round)


Score:118 Froch 109 Dirrell


Close fight, but Froch wanted it more. As evident by him throwing more,landing more and being much more aggressive.

Dirrell held Froch too much, and he wasnt active enough to win the fight. He was just running and waiting to land a big shot to ko Froch, which is very unlikely to happen... Dirrell is talented, but he got his tactics all wrong.


I watched the fight on my computer with the showtime commentators, who were heavily biased towards Dirrell. commenting on him landing a harmless counter punch right after froch threw 3-5 punches at him.

Basically you cant win rounds by only landing a few good punches and running for the rest of the round. Thats why i gave most of the rounds to Froch.

what were you watching

[BetterCallSaul]

You need to watch the fight again, he was painting Froch's face with hard shots in the last 2 rounds, he also hurt him towards the end so you are obviously talking out your arse, on the flip side you could not favour what Froch was doing over Dirrell's work because he wasn't landing **** all!!!

Get a clue son.

I watched the fight from the arena, you probably watched it on a stream you cheap f**k.