Just rewatched the fight? - post scorecards here

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Breakbeat
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2005
    • 7018
    • 233
    • 237
    • 8,994

    #41
    Originally posted by street bully
    Why do you keep avoiding the question I asked you. How are fights scored? moving, clinching, and spoiling do not cause you points, a fight is scored on punching, and not only did Direll land WAY more, along with the harder shots icne Froch was hurt. he also outthrew him. Funny how you guys come out of the woodwork with ridiculous score, and spend the rest of the time talking about ipods. Please tell me how you score a fight "spoiling tactics don't win fights| You are right there, but they don't lose you a fight either, couple that with outpunching your opponent, and they in you a fight.
    It depends on how you term punches, most of Dirrells punches were weak pitty pat little prods.

    Comment

    • slimshandy69
      I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 3642
      • 323
      • 3
      • 16,514

      #42
      round 1 froch

      round 2 froch

      round 3 froch

      round 4 dirrell
      round 5 froch

      round 6 froch

      round 7 froch
      round 8 froch

      rou8nd 9 froch
      roundn 10 froch

      round 11 dirrell
      round 12 froch...

      Comment

      • oldgringo
        Ellis
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2004
        • 12747
        • 968
        • 453
        • 30,064

        #43
        Originally posted by The Gambler1981
        I have watched the fight four times now (three last night and once this morning). I do not see how Froch won five rounds (let alone the seven required to win a fight).

        I understand that Dirrell should have done more to make it more clear to everyone that he was dominating the fight. If a fighter does 0 in the fight 0.5 seems like enough to win, although that does leaeve thing up to the eye of the beholder he should have taken the fight by the throat which he was clearly capable of doing.
        Right on.

        Dirrell could have seized the fight at any time after the first few rounds. He didn't do enough (with the exception of a couple rounds here and there) to punctuate his performance. He's way too negative in his approach to boxing.

        I thought he won by 2-3 points though.

        Comment

        • Sick/
          Banned
          • Feb 2009
          • 11284
          • 554
          • 866
          • 14,892

          #44
          Round 1 - Froch
          Round 2 - Froch
          Round 3 - Froch
          Round 4 - Froch
          Round 5 - Froch
          Round 6 - Froch
          Round 7 - Froch
          Round 8 - Froch
          Round 9 - Froch
          Round 10 -Froch
          Round 11 - Froch
          Round 12 - Froch

          Comment

          • Doorag
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 883
            • 34
            • 118
            • 7,208

            #45
            okay jim, 8-4 Andre Dirrell!

            Comment

            • street bully
              Tua's daddy.
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 25014
              • 697
              • 263
              • 35,118

              #46
              Originally posted by Breakbeat
              It depends on how you term punches, most of Dirrells punches were weak pitty pat little prods.
              Why was Froch hurt in the 11th round then? Nice pitty pats, I thought froch had a chin?

              Comment

              • Sam D. Menace
                Banned
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 700
                • 28
                • 29
                • 849

                #47
                Originally posted by Breakbeat
                It depends on how you term punches, most of Dirrells punches were weak pitty pat little prods.
                he was landing pity pat punches sending froch flying half the time, stopped him on his tracks on an occassion and then stunned the bum

                Comment

                • MOTHER DUCKER
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 7402
                  • 261
                  • 177
                  • 8,407

                  #48
                  Originally posted by street bully
                  Why was Froch hurt in the 11th round then? Nice pitty pats, I thought froch had a chin?
                  So now your saying Froch doesn't have a chin but also saying Dirrel was hitting him clean all night?? if so why was Froch Ktfo? what a ****ing idiot you are

                  Comment

                  • savorduhflavor
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 8194
                    • 288
                    • 59
                    • 14,875

                    #49
                    Dirrell clearly won that fight.

                    Comment

                    • Breakbeat
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 7018
                      • 233
                      • 237
                      • 8,994

                      #50
                      Originally posted by street bully
                      Why was Froch hurt in the 11th round then? Nice pitty pats, I thought froch had a chin?


                      The one highlight of the fight for Dirrell.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP