Just rewatched the fight? - post scorecards here

[Blue Heffner]

Froch didn't win a round untill the 7th. He wen't on to win the 8th round, and from there on I felt sorry and may have given him some rounds. Won 3 rounds, may have given him a round I shouldn't have. Like I said, he won no more then 4 rounds and landed no more then 3-4 solid shots. You can't win a fight if you don't land.

Exactly, Froch didn't win a round until the 7th. I can't believe how delusional and naive these Froch fans are. It's unbelievable.

[BetterCallSaul]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10-point_must_system

Then it's a 10-9 round for Froch.

[Pugilistic™]

R1 - even 10-10
R2 - Dirrell 10-9
R3 - Dirrell 10-9
R4 - Dirrell 10-9
R5 - Froch 10-9
R6 - Dirrell 10-9
R7 - Dirrell 10-9
R8 - Froch 10-9
R9 - Dirrell 10-9
R10 - even 9-9
R11 - Dirrell 10-9
R12 - Dirrell 10-9

117-111 Dirrell.

[REMOVED SHARK 97]

Froch - Slow, didn't land the bombs but landed the jab frequentely.

Dirrell - Fast dazling punches that were oversold as effective, ROFL ya Dirrell looked good because he was against someone slow, and people are kidding themselves because no matter how fast the shots were most were blocked, or out of range because he was back peddling, also if they were so effective you would see it, I didn't see Froch's head snap back many times.

+ the clinching, turning around, ducking and jumping ontop of Froch also didn't do him any favours.

Someone with Dirrells speed should of murdered Froch but didn't, he was too scared of getting hit by a powershot.


Draw, neither won.

[street bully]

Dirrell lost the fight for himself with all the holding and spoiling.

Ok, where in the rule book does it say holding and spoiling a fighters offense, and totally nullifying it, while you land 10 to every 1 makes you lose points? Please show me this. This was even more convincing than Malignaggi vs Diaz, since Froch was hurt got hit a lot and lost.

[BetterCallSaul]

R1 - even 10-10
R2 - Dirrell 10-9
R3 - Dirrell 10-9
R4 - Dirrell 10-9
R5 - Froch 10-9
R6 - Dirrell 10-9
R7 - Dirrell 10-9
R8 - Froch 10-9
R9 - Dirrell 10-9
R10 - even 9-9
R11 - Dirrell 10-9
R12 - Dirrell 10-9

117-111 Dirrell.

Was it a good stream?

[street bully]

Then it's a 10-9 round for Froch.

.. Man you guys are killing me. 10-9 for a round Direll dominated and got a point taken away in? that was 9-9.

[BetterCallSaul]

.. Man you guys are killing me. 10-9 for a round Direll dominated and got a point taken away in? that was 9-9.

That's is what I originally said. But then three different people tell me three different ways how to score the round.

9-9 then, like I said. Dirrell won that round.

[Bigchill79]

Ok, where in the rule book does it say holding and spoiling a fighters offense, and totally nullifying it, while you land 10 to every 1 makes you lose points? Please show me this. This was even more convincing than Malignaggi vs Diaz, since Froch was hurt got hit a lot and lost.

When its to the point that it dont belong in a ring.

[Breakbeat]

Ok, where in the rule book does it say holding and spoiling a fighters offense, and totally nullifying it, while you land 10 to every 1 makes you lose points? Please show me this. This was even more convincing than Malignaggi vs Diaz, since Froch was hurt got hit a lot and lost.

Face it Dirrell lost it for himself, all that falling on the floor business and feigning being fouled while holding Froch never scored points.