Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez once again undisputed after defeating mobile William Scull

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Teetotaler23 View Post
    Scull should of won!! Dat wuz boxing !!
    No, that was surviving. Real boxing is hitting your opponent without getting hit, while maintaining space to do it again. Scull fought negatively, electing to evade 99% of the time and putting himself out of his own range. And that's with him having the reach advantage over Canelo. Overall, he was ineffective and negative (hardly traits of what a true pure boxer should be).

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by damned1974 View Post

      That's because there would be people in attendance. lol Saudi shows really lack tbh, but as long as Turki is putting up the money then we get to see fights.
      Yeah cool or whatever but my point was not about promotion, it was solely about how Mexicans are surely ashamed & infuriated by Canelo's performance tonight.​

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by teetotaler23 View Post
        scull should of won!! Dat wuz boxing !!
        lol!!!

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by JeBron Lamez View Post

          Yeah cool or whatever but my point was not about promotion, it was solely about how Mexicans are surely ashamed & infuriated by Canelo's performance tonight.​
          I don't know. I could see many Mexican fans being more upset at Scull's negative fighting over Canelo's inability to land shots. One guy was always moving forward, and one guy was always moving away.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by JeBron Lamez View Post

            Yeah cool or whatever but my point was not about promotion, it was solely about how Mexicans are surely ashamed & infuriated by Canelo's performance tonight.​
            I'll be honest-if Scull fought like this against anyone else-how good do you think they would look? These type fighters are called spoilers for a reason. Does it mean Canelo couldn't have done more-no, but you're never gonna look good against an opponent like this when they are hellbent on survival and not winning.

            Comment


            • #26
              Is anyone REALLY suprised at this??
              Canelo has made an entire career based off of bogus fights that created the mirage that he’s this monster.
              The truth is he was long exposed when he fought Mayweather and Lara.
              After that the pattern was established as to how he would proceed in terms of opposition.
              it took him a Period to age out Golovkin and then going forward the bulk of his resume has been abysmal with a laundry list of no hopers, mediocre opponents, old men and little guys moving up in weight.
              Scully is the prototype of what is required to be in This cowards sweepstakes.
              Bivol was a mistake. Team Canelo thought Bivol would follow the script because he didn’t look spectacular in his last three bouts, just looking to score points and get a decision. But they underestimated just how skilled and high iq he is and Canelo got slapped around for 9 rounds and checked out of the fight mentally as early as the mid way point. He definitely made it written in stone that Benavides would not be invited to the sweepstakes no matter how bad his ducking looked.
              And yeah his sorry fanbase look even worse trying to keep boosting this fraud up and gaslighting with their laughable narratives.
              So tonight why should this farce be any different??
              So now we head to September for a bout with another small opponent up in age looking to upset the apple cart in Bud Crawford.
              But this time it may turn out to be a mistake like Bivol was. I sincerely hope so if for anything to see this manufactured fraud get exposed again and to see how creative the gaslighters will be with the excuses and other entertaining narratives.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by LEONIDAS26@ View Post
                Is anyone REALLY suprised at this??
                Canelo has made an entire career based off of bogus fights that created the mirage that he’s this monster.
                The truth is he was long exposed when he fought Mayweather and Lara.
                After that the pattern was established as to how he would proceed in terms of opposition.
                it took him a Period to age out Golovkin and then going forward the bulk of his resume has been abysmal with a laundry list of no hopers, mediocre opponents, old men and little guys moving up in weight.
                Scully is the prototype of what is required to be in This cowards sweepstakes.
                Bivol was a mistake. Team Canelo thought Bivol would follow the script because he didn’t look spectacular in his last three bouts, just looking to score points and get a decision. But they underestimated just how skilled and high iq he is and Canelo got slapped around for 9 rounds and checked out of the fight mentally as early as the mid way point. He definitely made it written in stone that Benavides would not be invited to the sweepstakes no matter how bad his ducking looked.
                And yeah his sorry fanbase look even worse trying to keep boosting this fraud up and gaslighting with their laughable narratives.
                So tonight why should this farce be any different??
                So now we head to September for a bout with another small opponent up in age looking to upset the apple cart in Bud Crawford.
                But this time it may turn out to be a mistake like Bivol was. I sincerely hope so if for anything to see this manufactured fraud get exposed again and to see how creative the gaslighters will be with the excuses and other entertaining narratives.
                had Trout beating him

                Erislandy a draw

                ggg deserved at least 1 win

                cement feet would always struggle against hood jabbers and/or movers

                eco1 eco1 BlackRobb BlackRobb like this.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by SouthpawRight View Post
                  had Trout beating him

                  Erislandy a draw

                  ggg deserved at least 1 win

                  cement feet would always struggle against hood jabbers and/or movers
                  "Had Trout beating him".....I mean, it was competitive but certainly a loss from Trout. GGG deserved a win, but lost 2 of the trilogy and Erislandy lost a close stick and move fight-with a whole lot of moving.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by damned1974 View Post

                    I'll be honest-if Scull fought like this against anyone else-how good do you think they would look? These type fighters are called spoilers for a reason. Does it mean Canelo couldn't have done more-no, but you're never gonna look good against an opponent like this when they are hellbent on survival and not winning.
                    If the Canelo who fought GGG either of the first two times fought Scull, I think he'd sleep him or liver shot him to hospital.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by 1nonlymre View Post

                      I don't know. I could see many Mexican fans being more upset at Scull's negative fighting over Canelo's inability to land shots. One guy was always moving forward, and one guy was always moving away.
                      My brother in creation, if being a defensive runner in survival mode meant you don't get knocked tf out then boxing would never have built any heroes.

                      Mexicans where you at, we need a poll!!!​
                      damned1974 damned1974 likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP