Ryan ain’t doing no Vada for rematch

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IronDanHamza
    BoxingScene Icon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 48782
    • 4,876
    • 268
    • 104,043

    #21
    Originally posted by Smash

    i did a bit of goggling and found this

    "In order for the program to be effective and credible, it should be run by Vada.

    Vada is the most reliable PED-testing entity in boxing. It conducts more thorough testing than any other entity and has the best reporting requirements.

    There was an eight-year period when the United States Anti-Doping Agency (Usada) administered 1,501 tests for performance enhancing drugs to 128 professional boxers. But Usada reported only one adverse finding regarding a professional boxer to a governing state athletic commission during that time. And that report came after a website revealed that the fighter in question had tested positive for a banned substance.

    It’s not plausible that Usada administered 1,501 tests to 128 professional boxers and that only one of these tests came back positive. By contrast, during the same time frame, Vada reported a positive test rate of almost 4%. Using the Vada benchmark, one would have expected that 60 of the 1,501 tests conducted by Usada would have yielded a positive result. After these numbers were made public in an investigative report, Usada stopped testing professional boxers"

    There are two main stumbling blocks to ridding boxing of PEDs: motivation and cost. Saudi Arabian power broker Turki Alalshikh is uniquely situated to surmount these obstacles


    what do u think about that?
    I think it's mostly garbage.

    Yes VADA tests for a few more things than USADA, and is the ideal of the two in my opinon for that reason. It doesn't mean USADA isn't a credible and gold standard testing procedure which is objectively is. To say it's "not plausible" to only have one positive test in that time frame is wrong, it's more than possible and certainly plausible.

    To compare the numbers is dumb because USADA is barely used in boxing in comparison to VADA.

    USADA was the testing protocol used in the UFC for over a decade and they caught a plethora of athletes during that time.

    Comment

    • MulaKO
      Zero F@cks Given
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2007
      • 26707
      • 6,723
      • 6,051
      • 221,421

      #22
      The controversy was between wada and usada

      Comment

      • IronDanHamza
        BoxingScene Icon
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 48782
        • 4,876
        • 268
        • 104,043

        #23
        Originally posted by MulaKO

        Isn’t Vada more expensive ???
        So you don’t recall controversy ???
        No, it's cheaper.

        USADA has made mistakes yes, it's impossible to avoid in this line of work with the none stop moving parts.

        VADA has made mistakes as well.

        None of this changes the fact that USADA is a gold standard drug testing procedure.

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 48782
          • 4,876
          • 268
          • 104,043

          #24
          Originally posted by Smash

          more gogling

          "In July, WADA announced they had begun a compliance review of USADA following their ongoing issues about the Chinese scandal. This review marks the first time the US has been subject to such a review, and if the review finds that the United States is not in compliance, they would be barred from participating in or hosting the Olympics in 2028 and 2034.

          Along with this review, WADA released a three-page letter sent to USADA Board Chair Dr. Tobie Smith, disparaging USADA. They state that the letter was initiated by an inquiry for CEADO about the U.S. anti-doping programs.

          The letter claims that 90% of American Athletes compete outside the jurisdiction of the World Anti-Doping Code. They also slammed the US for the number of doping tests the United States completes calling it “far from optimal”. They cited a 2023 report which put the USADA testing number at 7,773 samples from 3,011 athletes. They put this number against testing done by other countries highlighting that it is less than half the amount of tests Germany completes with less than half the U.S. budget.

          WADA also criticized the fact that in “more than half the sports, there was no in-competition testing carried out at all.” WADA goes on to slam the U.S. for their criticism of other countries. “USADA’s record does not compare favorably up against its peers in other countries. Yet, to distract from these serious issues with the state of the U.S. anti-doping system, USADA apparently tries to undermine U.S. athletes’ confidence in the integrity of their rivals overseas"

          https://swimswam.com/tension-continu...ada-and-usada/
          I think that article is criticizing the USA in general more than anything

          Comment

          • MulaKO
            Zero F@cks Given
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 26707
            • 6,723
            • 6,051
            • 221,421

            #25
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza

            No, it's cheaper.

            USADA has made mistakes yes, it's impossible to avoid in this line of work with the none stop moving parts.

            VADA has made mistakes as well.

            None of this changes the fact that USADA is a gold standard drug testing procedure.
            Just by doing some searches , not many think the way you do and much less consider usada as a gold standard

            Comment

            • IronDanHamza
              BoxingScene Icon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 48782
              • 4,876
              • 268
              • 104,043

              #26
              Originally posted by MulaKO

              Just by doing some searches , not many think the way you do and much less consider usada as a gold standard
              Oh if you read it on google it must be true.

              It IS a gold standard. That's not even debatable.

              It is objectively one of the best drug testing procedures in the world. Not an opinion, that's a fact.

              Comment

              • Smash
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2008
                • 15328
                • 6,323
                • 7,726
                • 21,172

                #27
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza

                I think that article is criticizing the USA in general more than anything
                "WADA also criticized the fact that in “more than half the sports, there was no in-competition testing carried out at all.”​

                does that not sound a bit iffy to u?

                Comment

                • MulaKO
                  Zero F@cks Given
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 26707
                  • 6,723
                  • 6,051
                  • 221,421

                  #28
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza

                  Oh if you read it on google it must be true.

                  It IS a gold standard. That's not even debatable.

                  It is objectively one of the best drug testing procedures in the world. Not an opinion, that's a fact.
                  I’m not attacking you or your credibility but reading from many posters and whatnot usada doesn’t seem to be as good as your stating
                  And just cause you’re saying it , must be truth ????

                  Comment

                  • Smash
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 15328
                    • 6,323
                    • 7,726
                    • 21,172

                    #29
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza



                    USADA was the testing protocol used in the UFC for over a decade and they caught a plethora of athletes during that time.
                    well that sounds like 100% scientific proof

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 48782
                      • 4,876
                      • 268
                      • 104,043

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Smash

                      well that sounds like 100% scientific proof
                      Scientific proof for what?

                      It's data, nothing more.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP