I think what might have been a contributing factor was how Benn handled it all. He was very public about going against the BBBoC, that their ruling was wrong, also made them look inept and powerless by going around them. I can imagine for their continued existence/relevance they would’ve had to push back hard to make an example.
IIRC the test had been positive for quite some time until someone leaked it to the press, so they might’ve been somewhat ok with the situation until a light was shone onto it.
Apparently A LOT of UK pros have popped dirty and quietly made it go away.
Oh my
You’ll have hell to pay with Sid
According to that guy it’s on everybody else thé peds , the steroids etc etc
Good luck
Oh my
You’ll have hell to pay with Sid
According to that guy it’s on everybody else thé peds , the steroids etc etc
Good luck
There's another guy who is really weird about it last time I mentioned about Benn and PEDs – can't remember what he's called but really odd, even by my standards.
Different rules for some. One would think if they actually cared about PEDs that Jarrell Miller would be on a lifetime ban also. Letting those guys fight really says everything about how seriously "cheating" is taken. It's a good question that ought to be asked of the top guys in British boxing.
There's another guy who is really weird about it last time I mentioned about Benn and PEDs – can't remember what he's called but really odd, even by my standards.
Either he's served a silent ban or his fight will be licensed by a foreign board.
He is licensed by an international board and has been for years.
Shouldn't matter because the BBBoC told Conor Benn (and Eubank Jr) is their rescheduled fight goes ahead while he's drug issue is still unresolved then there will be consequences.
Comment