Originally posted by DClefthook
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Report: Ryan Garcia Tests Positive for PED, Being Processed for Second Positive
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by 786 View PostThe worst part for me is the fact that people seemed to completely ignore Garcia cheating on the scales and talk as if he won fair and square just because they don't like Haney's dad and the Loma decision.
Boxing can be so infuriating. Why are their weight limits if fighters can come in heavy and still fight by paying a fine if the fight is high profile enough? What's the point of any rules if the **** doesn't always get enforced depending on who's doing the cheating? Now this PED thing comes to light and there are still people commenting as if it's no big deal and a legit win. It's frustrating as hell.
Imagine being a guy who actually weighs around 140, and you want to box. You are getting in to the ring with guys who are actually 150+ pound guys, they just medically removed all the fluid from their bodies for 48-72 hours before the weigh in. They make weight, are hooked up to IV's and their muscles fill back up with glycogen. They come into the ring, sometimes near jr Middleweights. Haney does it. Most of the champs do it now. This is how Tank beat a skeletal Garcia.
Which means anyone fighting naturally at 140 who actually weighs 140 is a huge disadvantage. And as a result, the weight classes are meaningless at this point.
Just make guys weigh in a few hours before the fight. Fixes a huge problem with that **** right there. If guys are willing to literally die by starving themselves to make a weight class, or to die in the ring to avoid bigger guys, that is on them. Suddenly we'd have fair fights, no weight bullying, all that BS would be gone.
As far as PED's, anyone in or around professional sports will tell you, if a guy is winning at the pro level, it is basically a certainty that they are using stuff. Armstrong was tested every which way and passed everything. Came out later it was all bs, buried bad results. It is the same in all sports. If a shot or a pill means winning or losing, a guy will do it and pay someone to cover it up. If a shot or pill is needed to even compete, a guy will do it and pay someone to cover it up. Take a drug testing blood drawer making $20 an hour and give them tens of thousands to make sure it is clean. Take someone working at VADA making $20 an hour and give them tens of thousands to make a test dirty.
It is all just corrupt bull****. Just let them all dope and see who wins. They are anyway.Last edited by Theshotyoudontsee; 05-02-2024, 04:23 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
Since when has one good ass whooping ever ended a fighter’s career? Perhaps 20 years from now he’ll feel the the effects of it but not now as an active fighter.
However, he doesn’t want to take too many of them because it could potentially shave many years off his career.
Besides, Ryan Garcia was a fight that Haney didn’t have to take. It was a voluntary challenge.
Devin Haney is a great athlete. His body was well conditioned, both physically fit and healthy.
So it should heal just fine.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 786 View PostThe worst part for me is the fact that people seemed to completely ignore Garcia cheating on the scales and talk as if he won fair and square just because they don't like Haney's dad and the Loma decision.
Boxing can be so infuriating. Why are their weight limits if fighters can come in heavy and still fight by paying a fine if the fight is high profile enough? What's the point of any rules if the **** doesn't always get enforced depending on who's doing the cheating? Now this PED thing comes to light and there are still people commenting as if it's no big deal and a legit win. It's frustrating as hell.786 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
Beterbiev has never tested positive for anything so it's not a spin.
Every one who fails a drug test is considered guilty until they prove otherwise.
You're not entitled to the benefit of the doubt when you fail multiple drug tests. It's the literal scientific proof of the drugs in your system.
Benefit of the doubt basically just means that you are given a chance to prove that you didn't cheat before you are banned. If there was no benefit of the doubt you would be banned immediately, without any need for an investigation first.Last edited by kafkod; 05-02-2024, 04:32 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View Post
Testing positive basically just means that you provide a test result that could indicate PED abuse and needs investigating.
Benefit of the doubt basically just means that you are given a chance to prove that you didn't cheat before you are banned. If there was no benefit of the doubt you would be banned immediately, without any need for an investigation first.
How it got there is a different story, and realistically how it got there is irrelevant. You have a banned substance in your system, which is illegal. The fighter is responsible for what goes in their body. And on top of that, it is impossible to prove whether or not someone used them intentionally or not, it's (educated) guess work at very best.
Which is why anyone who fails a drug test is not entitled to the benefit of the doubt. Even if the commission in use deems it "unintentional" (with no way of proving it) they'll still always have that black mark next to them for simply having the drugs in their system.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
No, not at all. Testing positive means that you categorially have a banned substance in your system. It doesn't "indicate" PED abuse, it scientifically proves PED use.
And even if they get popped for actual banned substances, they can be exonerated and cleared if they can prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that they didn't use it deliberately and took all reasonable precautions to avoid ingesting it accidentally.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View Post
Not so. Many athletes have been banned for elevated levels of stuff like HGH and testosterone, which are not banned substances because they occur naturally in the body. It's the amount of the substance in their system that indicates cheating.
And even if they get popped for actual banned substances, they can be exonerated and cleared if they can prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that they didn't use it deliberately and took all reasonable precautions to avoid ingesting it accidentally.
Well you just stated the exact problem right there, as it's impossible to demonstrably prove beyond reasonable doubt that a PED wasn't used deliberately.
It's why failing a drug test leaves no benefit of the doubt on the person that's failed. There is no excuse for having a PED in your system. It's very easily avoidable.
Comment
Comment