That may be true in a general sense, but my problem is specifically with Tyson Fury. I don't like the guy, I think he's been bad for boxing, and I'm looking forward to him and his grifting family being gone from boxing.
That may be true in a general sense, but my problem is specifically with Tyson Fury. I don't like the guy, I think he's been bad for boxing, and I'm looking forward to him and his grifting family being gone from boxing.
And that's why its so easy for you to run with anything negative about the guy, Im not being personal that's just human nature, most people run on emotion and very little logic, again nothing personal its just the way I see so many people.
And that's why its so easy for you to run with anything negative about the guy, Im not being personal that's just human nature, most people run on emotion and very little logic, again nothing personal its just the way I see so many people.
The problems I have with Fury have a tangible basis in reality but whatever. These types of discussion never lead to a productive outcome do they?
Sorry to hear that. I wish you have a better life.
My life's great, I simply stop following boxing when I find it too boring/irritating. I've reengaged since the Saudi project and, whatever my problem with Fury, he has taken the best fight available to him and I'm looking forward to seeing it. I just won't be watching any press conferences or interviews.
Because God forbid anyone be su****ious of the guy who's already popped positive for PEDs...
Fury fanboys are absolutely delusional.
And yes, I happen to know that next you're going to repeat the old, and unsubstantiated saw that they're all doing it. But Fury got caught...
What was proven is wild boar meat. Just as people accuse Holyfield without having any proof, but hey - for some he is as guilty of using PEDs as if he was busted.
Fury fanboys you say - like his haters I'd say. Two sides of the same coin. I happen to know which one you belong to because it ain't the objectivity.
What was proven is wild boar meat. Just as people accuse Holyfield without having any proof, but hey - for some he is as guilty of using PEDs as if he was busted.
Fury fanboys you say - like his haters I'd say. Two sides of the same coin. I happen to know which one you belong to because it ain't the objectivity.
There's literally nothing objective about defending a guy who's popped positive twice and saying that being su****ious of him is identical to being less su****ious of the guy who's enrolled in VADA for every fight and never had a positive test.
Positive test means he took PEDs. Period. You can't test positive without PEDs in your body. And he also never got cleared. He got suspended for 2 years. If you want to be credulous, that's on you, but you have NO ROOM to be talking about objectivity. I was a Fury fan once but you know the saying... Fool me once, shame on you. At this point, you're getting fooled for the umpteenth time and you still aren't su****ious? You know the rest.
Comment