Comments Thread For: Remembering Roberto Duran: The Best Wins Authored by 'Hands of Stone'

[Combat Talk Radio]

The best of the fab four

Even though he lost to the other three?

Anyway...here's a positive memory some on here won't recall

289-Yna-Axpw.gif

[Feroz]

That's quite the worrisome title, glad Duran's condition is improving.

I’m still not sure how he beat Barkley. At 37 years old, that was just ridiculous.

Considering the massive size difference (5'6 originating four divisions below vs 6'1), Barkley being a puncher with 63% knockout rate, and immediately coming from having blown out a 29 year old Thomas Hearns's by KO. (he also beat him in a close rematch at light heavyweight).

It's highly impressive that he did so at 37 years old.

[just the facts]

I like SRL a heck of a lot. But duran was the greatest of the four. Losing h2h don't mean much, we all know that

This is the dumbest phucking thing I’ve ever read. If it’s your opinion that Duran is the best of the four, with the longevity and tremendous lightweight reign, no problem. But when you post incredibly dumb shyte like “h2h don’t mean much”, you aren’t really that dumb, are you? Likely the stupidest post in NSB history and that’s saying a lot.

[just the facts]

I'm hoping Roberto makes it to 100! His fight with Barkley is one of the most entertaining fights ever. His first battle with Leonard is epic. His defeat of Davey Moore is one of the worst beatings. He arguably beat Marvin Hagler. He crushed Cuevas like a tomato can. His fight with Buchannan was savage. And for Duran to take down Buchannan who had much more experience at the time, at just 21 years old, was huge. And then he bested DeJesus twice in two fun fights. There will always be a case for Duran being the best of all time.

Arguably beat Hagler? Exactly who’s making that argument?

[ElCampeon101]

He can arguably be the greatest of them with his longevity and success through the weight classes but best would be a hard sell since he lost to all of them.

Duran is also the only one of the Four Kings to defeat Sugar Ray Leonard and the only fighter to ever defeat Leonard during his prime.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Arguably beat Hagler? Exactly who’s making that argument?

Larry Holmes thought so. It was close but damn. A middleweight champion should have ran over a natural lightweight and Hagler did anything but that. Duran landed well and timed him and made him look like crap. Hagler even started just moving away in the eleventh and had no clue. It's not a hard argument to make.

[DeeMoney]

He can arguably be the greatest of them with his longevity and success through the weight classes but best would be a hard sell since he lost to all of them.

But he was also the oldest and smallest of all of them. He fought them all AT their best weights, not his. On a relative P4P level Prime Duran is better than any of the others at their prime.

[DeeMoney]

This is the dumbest phucking thing I’ve ever read. If it’s your opinion that Duran is the best of the four, with the longevity and tremendous lightweight reign, no problem. But when you post incredibly dumb shyte like “h2h don’t mean much”, you aren’t really that dumb, are you? Likely the stupidest post in NSB history and that’s saying a lot.

He beat Leonard H2H at Leonards top weight. But thats not the point, its a P4P comparison. There have been plenty of fighters who lost to P4P lesser fighters because they moved up into the lesser fighters natural weight.

[zipped]

Greatest fighter of all time.

Best pound for pound fighter of the ‘70’s, and greatest lightweight in history, most complete fighting machine from ‘75-‘80, beat the biggest fighter of the incredible ‘80’s in probably the single best win ever, the only former lightweight champ who could last 15 with peak Hagler, the only 37 year old former lightweight champ who could beat peak Barkley. Unmatched technical ferocity, challenged himself like no other fighter of the past 60 years, avoided no-one.

Hope you do live to 100 Roberto.

Styles still make fights. There was NEVER a time in Roberto Duran's career where he would have EVER stood a chance against Thomas Hearns.

[zipped]

That's quite the worrisome title, glad Duran's condition is improving.



Considering the massive size difference (5'6 originating four divisions below vs 6'1), Barkley being a puncher with 63% knockout rate, and immediately coming from having blown out a 29 year old Thomas Hearns's by KO. (he also beat him in a close rematch at light heavyweight).

It's highly impressive that he did so at 37 years old.

Duran beating Iran Barkley in a 12 round SPLIT decision doesn't mean Duran would EVER beat Thomas Hearns, just because Iran Barkley beat Thomas Hearns twice, with their first fight being a 3rd round TKO and Tommy losing a second fight with Iran Barkley in a 12 round SPLIT decision. That's why they fight the fights. Hearns always had too much fire power & skill for Duran to deal with. Thomas Hearns was a better boxer than Sugar Ray Leonard. In 15 rounds, Ray only won 4 rounds and the 14th where Ray won in his first fight with Thomas Hearns, but everybody know Tommy Hearns beat the dog do do otta Leonard. Leonard eye was NEVER the same. Tommy mess Ray up for life.