Comments Thread For: Mayweather Hints At Pacquiao Exhibition

[Roadblock]

Are you serious? Floyd took the fight after Pac was on the slide. Then when Pac said he had injured his shoulder - Floyd refused him a rematch. This is hardly warrior stuff. Ali makes Floyd look like a little boy. Guy took on beasts when they were beasts...

Floyd beat a novice Canelo, mocked him for agreeing to lose weight (Called him ******) then refused to rematch him once he got good

It's Floyd fans who are delusional. Guy was too scared to even fight Amir Khan when he still looked good. Khan won Floyd's *own* Twitter poll for next opponent. Watching Floyd duck out of it was hella funny!

Are you serious Manny walked in 2010 because he didnt want to be PED tested the same as he ordered Rios to have, Manny was also offered his highest ever purse in a well documented direct phone call from Floyd , when the fight was made who actually instigated it, Floyd thats who and he confronted Manny man to man to get it made.

Now you tell me exactly what did Manny do himself to make that fight, fkn nothing, all he did was use Floyd to sell his next fight just the same as he does now, after this one we want Mayweather, and empty heads like you swallowed it.

If you want to talk sht offer proof to back it up, why talk sht what is the purpose of believing a lie, you people amaze in how gullible and non researched you are, you will ignore facts that dont fit with your agenda, just unreal the amount of gullible people in this place.

[hugh grant]

Not engaging this to that extent Floyd won and Floyd was older than pac when they fought and on the slide himself

Doesn't matter what you post the history books say Floyd beat Pac and theres nothing you can do about it

Lol, floyd older than pac, but pac had 70 fights?. Boxing isn't about chronical age, because it's obvious boxers age at different rates depending on they're career paths.
Pac s had more wars, more fights, more years in boxing.

Yes, the zeros all that mattered for floyd, not the context of wins, as long as he had the zero

[Roadblock]

Lol, floyd older than pac, but pac had 70 fights?. Boxing isn't about chronical age, because it's obvious boxers age at different rates depending on they're career paths.
Pac s had more wars, more fights, more years in boxing.

Yes, the zeros all that mattered for floyd, not the context of wins, as long as he had the zero

Only the 0 was the result of beating the best of his era; no one has a better resume in his era; the 0 was because of how good he was; it makes me laugh at the narrative you try to spin that beating everyone is the result of magic, since 2010 Ive challenged all you fck wits to debate Manny and Floyds career fight by fight numbers weights form of opponents going into fights and not one has taken me up on it.

[Johnny_Roa]

As opposed to many people that watched Floyd fights to see him lose, I watched him because I enjoyed how good he was. But he is not the best boxer of all times, not even top 5

[JuniorTorres720]

Pacquiao > Mayweather. Mayweather was always overly strategic when selecting his opposition while Pacquiao took the mosts risks. Mayweather's perfect record is more a factor in his brand than his actual fights are.

[GoldenBackHand]

Good to see Jake Donovan and others have been OUSTED LOL

[dan-b]

The most important frame in your post is " I took that to mean ", and that is where things take some very weird turns into personal agendas based on emotional conditioning formed by second, third, and fourthhand information, in which possibly none of them may be true.

A famous guy in his field once said to me, you know they can create lies out of thin air, accuse, condemn and sentence, then spread it around like Marmalade on toast to be consumed by a sea of fools.

How did you interpret "smart business decisions" then? Because if it actually meant "I always target the most dangerous opponent" he could have just said that.

[dan-b]

Only the 0 was the result of beating the best of his era; no one has a better resume in his era; the 0 was because of how good he was; it makes me laugh at the narrative you try to spin that beating everyone is the result of magic, since 2010 Ive challenged all you fck wits to debate Manny and Floyds career fight by fight numbers weights form of opponents going into fights and not one has taken me up on it.

Probably because it's a waste of energy "debating" something so subjective and you're not that important.

If you think Floyd is the best, why do you care what other people think? You can use any metric you like, it won't change the fact I found the guy to be a dull businessman.

[IronDanHamza]

How did you interpret "smart business decisions" then? Because if it actually meant "I always target the most dangerous opponent" he could have just said that.

He did say that, ad naseum.

[Roadblock]

How did you interpret "smart business decisions" then? Because if it actually meant "I always target the most dangerous opponent" he could have just said that.

Smart decisions are about the business as he said, could be the purse could be the deal cut could be the contract could be the back end of merchandise etc etc, its actually about the making of money, you automatically equate it to the opponent because of your predisposition, subconsciously you have Floyd stereotyped and set in stone and it shows in your phrasing and chosen words.