Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
View Post
Yet VADA, in your words the better testing company, said Beterbiev's case is not only not suspicious but in fact common.
That has to mean by your own logic that don't find it suspicious?
Unless you're saying VADA are corrupt?
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
View Post
But not more suspicious than the likes of Floyd Mayweather for example, who you deem "clean".
Or not more suspicious than Vergil Ortiz for example, who you deem "clean by the benefit of the doubt".
He'd more more suspicious than someone like Franics Ngannou for example, who you deem "assuredly on PEDs" with zero evidence what so ever.
But a lot less suspicious than the likes of Canelo, a guy who's failed multiple drug tests, that you deem "likely clean".
I find all suspicious behavior suspicious, you pick and choose what you deem suspicious and move the goal post whenever it suits you.
Comment