Comments Thread For: BoxingScene.com's 2023 Fighter of The Year: Naoya Inoue

[Aware]

By the way, since you seem to be interested in the welterweights, I would like to ask you of what you think Spence will do after his consecutive loss to Bud in the waste of time rematch. Will he retire with decent money as a dime a dozen former unified champion, or will he try to resurrect his career at 154 or 160?

Just more shots at Spence in the form of an insincere question.

[Elheath]

Just more shots at Spence in the form of an insincere question.

In all seriousness though, does anyone, even the most loyal Spence fan like you actually believe he can win his immediate rematch against Crawford if the rumors for February are true?

I've personally said multiple times that for Spence's career sake, he was better off forgetting immediate rematch and going up to 154 and defeat Tszyu for his belt (which I think Spence would win), get settled in 154 or maybe even try going undisputed against Jermell and wait to see if Crawford comes up to 154 if he still wanted a rematch.

[Boro]

I'll post others vids as well. You can try to be a revisionist, it ain't working though.

- "Arguably the most significant boxing match since May-Pac"

- " In all of the fights in all of combat sports that could possibly be made this year...this was the one..."

https://******************/4UKVQzb-zzw?*************d - Potential to be fight of a generation

Stephen "Breadman" Edwards https://www.boxingscene.com/breadman...awford--176507 - "Fight of the century that we all enjoy."

Domino! Mate! All that ****. GTFOH!

p.s. Floyd Patterson won FOTY with 1 fight... discredit that one.

Arguably being the imperative word rétard and you left out the "in the welterweight division".

Don't link two degenerates from MMA to try and prove a point about boxing, listen to some of the crap they say like the 4 belt era being recognised since 88 like WTF LMAO, no one seen the WBO as a "real" belt until after ODLH and Hopkins fought in 04.

And again comparing fighters who are incomparable, Patterson had lost his undisputed status getting knocked out by Johansson.

And he went on to reclaim said status, the first man to ever do so I might add by doing the same to Johansson they're not at all comparable, are you all there son!? this is the second time you've done this now...

[Aware]

Arguably being the imperative word rétard and you left out the "in the welterweight division".

Don't link two degenerates from MMA to try and prove a point about boxing, listen to some of the crap they say like the 4 belt era being recognised since 88 like WTF LMAO, no one seen the WBO as a "real" belt until after ODLH and Hopkins fought in 04.

And again comparing fighters who are incomparable, Patterson had lost his undisputed status getting knocked out by Johansson.

And he went on to reclaim said status, the first man to ever do so I might add by doing the same to Johansson they're not at all comparable, are you all there son!? this is the second time you've done this now...

No, sir! The quote from Rummy's video is correct. There are two separate statements. The first one is for all of boxing and the second one is for the welterweight division. I can't in good conscience continue our interaction since you gaslight and deny reality.


The Guardian
www.theguardian.com
Spence v Crawford: quiet Americans clash in best fight boxing can deliver

https://www.latimes.com/sports/story...d-errol-spence
"It’s finally here, the best fight that could be made in boxing."

"The hard-headed always gotta feel it to believe it."

[Boro]

No, sir! The quote from Rummy's video is correct. There are two separate statements. The first one is for all of boxing and the second one is for the welterweight division. I can't in good conscience continue our interaction since you gaslight and deny reality.


The Guardian
www.theguardian.com
Spence v Crawford: quiet Americans clash in best fight boxing can deliver

https://www.latimes.com/sports/story...d-errol-spence
"It’s finally here, the best fight that could be made in boxing."

"The hard-headed always gotta feel it to believe it."

And as I pointed out the imperative word was "ARGUABLY" you simpleton, you do understand what that means don't you, or you still riding the shortbus?!

And the Welterweight part is when he says "it's undoubtedly the most significant fight at welter"

That's a given, PBC was just having their fighters doing round robin, whilst claiming their greatness.

Stating the obvious doesn't make Bud FOTY by default as you're trying to imply...

I've not gaslit anyone either, every time i've quoted you, i've just proven your ****** arguments (if they could even be called that) wrong and broken down why they are wrong.

If that's what constitutes gaslighting in your world than have at it.

[_Rexy_]

It's definitely possible. But I guarantee no one's ever knocked out an undefeated top 5 p4p unified champ to become the 1st male boxer to be undisputed at 2 weight classes.

Spence was far more hyped up than he should have been, I never even thought he was top 10 let alone top 5. But Bud was top 3 P4P so it’s not like it was some insane feat. I won money off the stoppage

[crimsonfalcon07]

How is it nitpicking when I asked for 4 opponents and he didn't name 4 opponents? You don't get full credit in school for that. Cong**** on finishing the challenge!

It's nitpicking because it's an arbitrary amount. All of which was explained, but I guess you lack reading comprehension. I named quite a lot more names than 4, and provided the relevant picture to understand the resumes. The fact that you don't understand that merely proves my multiple points, not a single one of which you've addressed.

First. Naming opponents is nothing more than an indicator of whether you follow the division. You have yet to acknowledge or respond to that point.

Second. It's an arbitrary number. What does mentioning that Fulton beat Paulus Abundus for the IBO belt do for his resume? What matters is significant opposition. You're nitpicking the opposition of his opponents. We could do the same for Spence. His opponents took place entirely within the welterweight division. So name four good wins for, say, Danny Garcia in the welterweight division. You can't, because he lost all the significant fights in that division. How is that a good win for a welterweight? He won a vacant belt off of an old Guerrero, and then lost every fight against the other top guys. Understanding the resume is what matters. That's why you are nitpicking, and why it's obvious you have an agenda that has nothing to do with facts.

I've never thought Spence was a P4P guy. His achievements are entirely within one division, and are almost entirely older or smaller guys whose primary accomplishments came in other divisions. We talked about Danny Garcia. How about Ugas? His only notable win was an old Manny Pacquiao on a bad night. He just lost to a secondary 140lb guy who lost to a 135 lb secondary titlist. Mikey Garcia has zero relevant wins at welterweight, and just lost to a 140lb contender in Sandor Martin, who is only as widely known as he is because he gave Teofimo Lopez a bad time. Porter is probably the best win, having a similar sort of win record as Fulton, except Fulton was undefeated and Porter wasn't. Kell Brook was coming off being wrecked by Golovkin before the Spence fight.

It's easy to crap all over a fighter, especially when you don't know anything about the divisions he fights in. All it proves is your ignorance.

[boxing IQ]

Spence was far more hyped up than he should have been, I never even thought he was top 10 let alone top 5. But Bud was top 3 P4P so it’s not like it was some insane feat. I won money off the stoppage

Rex, I don't think you truly believe that. Sure, Kell got his face broken prior but he looked sharp as hell in both fights with GGG and Spence. The fight with Porter took some of the shine off but Porter started training right after his crap performance against Ugas, who was the version Spence thought he was getting until fight night showed otherwise. Still, he did what he had to against a top welterweight so his resume's legit.

Glad you got to bankroll on the win. Bud's just a f***ing beast. The fact that Boxing Scene has him as #1 p4p balances the scales for me.

[Zaroku]

By Keith Idec - "The Monster" made 2023 his most historically significant year since Naoya Inoue made his pro debut in October 2012. Inoue entered the year as boxing's undisputed bantamweight champion. He ended the year as the sport's fully unified junior featherweight champion after defeating a pair of unified 122-pound champions during a legacy-enhancing five-month stretch.
[Click Here To Read More]

he’s a mean lil j dude…inoue visits a coffee shop 30 meters from here.

he likes Jhonny

I want new pinoy fighters to throw hands and go to war pinoy style!

[_Rexy_]

Rex, I don't think you truly believe that. Sure, Kell got his face broken prior but he looked sharp as hell in both fights with GGG and Spence. The fight with Porter took some of the shine off but Porter started training right after his crap performance against Ugas, who was the version Spence thought he was getting until fight night showed otherwise. Still, he did what he had to against a top welterweight so his resume's legit.

Glad you got to bankroll on the win. Bud's just a f***ing beast. The fact that Boxing Scene has him as #1 p4p balances the scales for me.

TBH, I thought Spence was overrated since the Olympics. He had a nice run, and was a fun fighter, but at no point in any of his fights did I ever watch him and felt "This guy is the future" "This guy is a top talent in the sport" I never had him #1 at welterweight, so how would I have him top 5 in the entire sport? He had a number of flaws that for some reason nobody took advantage of until Bud.

I'm not saying I'm this incredible eye for talent, I've been wrong a number of times as well, but I've been right alot more, and I was right this time lol.