If Calzaghe fought at MW Hop would never have been champ

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #341
    Originally posted by IMDAZED
    Not an if, I did. He won a vacant title against a weight-drained, past his prime fighter who had been sitting on his couch a week before. Then didn't face another titlist for years - I mean years. But we're belittling Jones' LHW reign?
    Are we?

    Breathe mate.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #342
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      Are we?

      Breathe mate.
      You are.

      Of course 2 of Roys titles were Dariusz's knock offs. Yeah, Roy really had it locked down at LHW.
      Not beating the champion to do it.

      Yeah total domination.
      You know, if you applied the same logic to the fighters you have a hard-on for, you wouldn't have much to talk about.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #343
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        You are.




        You know, if you applied the same logic to the fighters you have a hard-on for, you wouldn't have much to talk about.
        I have a raging hard on for Prime Roy.

        But he was never undisputed champion. Thats just a fact. So all this "Joe and Hopkins wouldnt have won a title if Roy was there" stuff is bollox.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #344
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          I have a raging hard on for Prime Roy.

          But he was never undisputed champion. Thats just a fact. So all this "Joe and Hopkins wouldnt have won a title if Roy was there" stuff is bollox.
          That's not a fact. He was the undisputed champ and was recognized as such. Now if you have some proof stating otherwise, feel free to share.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #345
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            That's not a fact. He was the undisputed champ and was recognized as such. Now if you have some proof stating otherwise, feel free to share.
            You cant seriously be this ignorant?

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #346
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              You cant seriously be this ignorant?
              I'm still waiting, Dirk.

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #347
                Originally posted by IMDAZED
                I'm still waiting, Dirk.
                As am I for a definition of undisputed.

                Picking up titles which have been stripped from the champion wasnt what i was looking for.

                Comment

                • Chr0nic
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 4501
                  • 191
                  • 213
                  • 5,494

                  #348


                  former middleweight, former supermiddleweight, and two time lightheavyweight champion
                  the reigning, defending, ''undisputed'' light heavyweight champion of the world, ROY...JOOOOOOONES..JNR

                  Comment

                  • IMDAZED
                    Fair but Firm
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 42644
                    • 1,134
                    • 1,770
                    • 67,152

                    #349
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    As am I for a definition of undisputed.

                    Picking up titles which have been stripped from the champion wasnt what i was looking for.
                    If you don't believe Roy Jones was the undisputed champ of the world, please explain why. Stating that someone else got "stripped" isn't a reason. That person chose not to defend the titles--that's usually what happens.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #350
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED
                      If you don't believe Roy Jones was the undisputed champ of the world, please explain why. Stating that someone else got "stripped" isn't a reason. That person chose not to defend the titles--that's usually what happens.
                      Are you playing dumb? Its fairly obvious. You cant be undisputed if theres a dispute.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP