If Calzaghe fought at MW Hop would never have been champ

[Dirk Diggler UK]

What does that matter? At the end of the day, you have to relate it back to boxing since that's what we're discussing. And during Roy's reign undisputed meant you held the three major titles. Period.

Its all relative.

Of course 2 of Roys titles were Dariusz's knock offs. Yeah, Roy really had it locked down at LHW.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Lol, I guess you just don't get it. We ARE talking about boxing.

How was there somebody who disputed Roy's reign when as of 2003-10-18, Gonzalez was the holder of the only LHW title Jones didn't possess and he had been completely and utterly f.ucking dominated by Roy before that?

Please, just stop, this is getting pitiful man.

So you dont know what it means then? Fair enough. I rest my case.

[IMDAZED]

Its all relative.

Of course 2 of Roys titles were Dariusz's knock offs. Yeah, Roy really had it locked down at LHW.

I would say so. Picking up three titles in about a year, defending it eleven times. Not bad at all.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I would say so. Picking up three titles in about a year, defending it eleven times. Not bad at all.

Not beating the champion to do it.

Yeah total domination.

[Chase8400]

Too bad. He needs to get on a private forum then.

Agreed. Some people just don't get it. I've been through this with him before, I guess he just prefers a good internet tussle over a real one.

[IMDAZED]

Not beating the champion to do it.

Yeah total domination.

Nonsense. Using that logic, Joe Calzaghe was never champ at 168.

[Chase8400]

Not beating the champion to do it.

Yeah total domination.

Destroying the the guy that destroyed that champion = total division domination. Case closed.

You know you read what I wrote before and have nothing to say on it suprisingly and since you are so hung up on word meanings, trade in your BOXING forum affiliation for a WEBSTERS DICTIONARY forum. We would all be better off.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Nonsense. Using that logic, Joe Calzaghe was never champ at 168.

If you say so.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Destroying the the guy that destroyed that champion = total division domination. Case closed.

You know you read what I wrote before and have nothing to say on it suprisingly and since you are so hung up on word meanings, trade in your BOXING forum affiliation for a WEBSTERS DICTIONARY forum. We would all be better off.

Yes because we crown undisputed champions based on flimsy triangle theories.

[IMDAZED]

If you say so.

Not an if, I did. He won a vacant title against a weight-drained, past his prime fighter who had been sitting on his couch a week before. Then didn't face another titlist for years - I mean years. But we're belittling Jones' LHW reign?