If Calzaghe fought at MW Hop would never have been champ
Collapse
-
-
I don't see the difference. I suspect Eubank's difficulty making weight, plus being given an extremely short time to prepare for Calzaghe (taking it on short notice), may have been a factor. But I don't see anything in Joe's power today that's any different from the guy who fought Omar Sheika. I'm waiting for examples but I don't see any.Comment
-
I don't see the difference. I suspect Eubank's difficulty making weight, plus being given an extremely short time to prepare for Calzaghe (taking it on short notice), may have been a factor. But I don't see anything in Joe's power today that's any different from the guy who fought Omar Sheika. I'm waiting for examples but I don't see any.Comment
-
If they fought in their primes at a catchweight
it would have been
Hopkins (stamina + agression) versus Calzaghe (Power)
based on the workings of their last fight
i have Hopkins schooling Calzaghe
same goes for Calzaghe versus Jones
Calzaghe (Power) vs Jones (No fear, better speed and footwork)
can't compare Calzaghe's strength to Ruiz, Tarver and Johnson
i have Jones winning by far
End of debate!Comment
-
thats no guess....thats exactly what he did...Comment
-
I don't see the difference. I suspect Eubank's difficulty making weight, plus being given an extremely short time to prepare for Calzaghe (taking it on short notice), may have been a factor. But I don't see anything in Joe's power today that's any different from the guy who fought Omar Sheika. I'm waiting for examples but I don't see any.Comment
-
Nope...can't see it and don't need your help. Have plenty of Calzaghe fights on file and he was always a volume puncher. He stopped you on accumulation, not power. And I see NO difference, from 1997 to his retirement. Pointing to him hurting a Eubank who took the fight on a weeks notice and could barely squeeze into 168 tells me nothing.Comment
-
Nope...can't see it and don't need your help. Have plenty of Calzaghe fights on file and he was always a volume puncher. He stopped you on accumulation, not power. And I see NO difference, from 1997 to his retirement. Pointing to him hurting a Eubank who took the fight on a weeks notice and could barely squeeze into 168.
But you need only watch the shots he landed on him, Sheika, Mitchell, Veit etc and then watch him against Manfredo, Hopkins, Jones etc and see he punched with more conviction back then.Comment
-
What does Eubank squeezing to 168 have to do with the way Calzaghe delivered his punches? Newsflash - Eubank always squeezed down to whatever weight he was fighting at. He was never a hard trainer and wouldnt eat for over a week before fights. He still had one of the best chins of his era.
But you need only watch the shots he landed on him, Sheika, Mitchell, Veit etc and then watch him against Manfredo, Hopkins, Jones etc and see he punched with more conviction back then.
And I've watched all those fights you mentioned, minus Veit and see no difference. The same guy flurrying against Manfredo is the same guy flurrying against Sheika. Solid power at best and he always cleverly mixed in power shots with pitty-pats. It was the first thing I noticed about him.Comment
-
It has plenty when he's given days to do get down to 168. The guy moved up to cruiserweight after Calzaghe. Common sense isn't so common anymore.
And I've watched all those fights you mentioned, minus Veit and see no difference. The same guy flurrying against Manfredo is the same guy flurrying against Sheika. Solid power at best and he always cleverly mixed in power shots with pitty-pats. It was the first thing I noticed about him.Comment
Comment