Judges are usually steered away from tie rds. You think there should be more of them & I agree, but the reality is they are considered things bad judges do if you here long time judges discuss the topic.
And swing rds don't need to be in the rules. Its simply a rd where there is dispute. One judge could prefer x, another could prefer y & in a close rd they give to different guys off of that.
Not true at all. I would agree the rds Loma won clearly he won them more clearly if thats a thing.
Look man I'm not watching this fight again let alone on slomo lmfao. It wasn't even THAT good of a fight, but I'd argue if you gotta watch the fight on slomo to determine who won it was a pretty fooking close fight.
100% agree with you here.
I do subscribe to the concept that there are close enough fights with enough swing rds that the margin of error between either guy winning is possible without anything corrupt, biased or sketchy needing to be involved. And this fight qualifies as that for me based on what I saw, the official cards & what the overall boxrec fan scorecards are saying.
Yea idk about all this bs. I'm not big on things ppl say in boxing to hype or downplay things in general. And I definitely don't think TR is fooking over their own guy for a guy whos gonna be a free agent after the fight. I don't question promoters doing sketchy sh^t on some level, but this is big sketchy sh^t that doesn't even help them lol. Why fook over Loma for a guy you don't have rights too?
And swing rds don't need to be in the rules. Its simply a rd where there is dispute. One judge could prefer x, another could prefer y & in a close rd they give to different guys off of that.
Haney needs to be given every "swing" round to win, and he got outlanded in all but 3 rounds.
Rewatch it on slow motion and count landed punches and recall the "effective aggression" metric and give us your scorecard, please.
Then there's the false narrative that "to be the champ you have to beat the champ" means that you have to win clearly. That's nonsense.
I do subscribe to the concept that there are close enough fights with enough swing rds that the margin of error between either guy winning is possible without anything corrupt, biased or sketchy needing to be involved. And this fight qualifies as that for me based on what I saw, the official cards & what the overall boxrec fan scorecards are saying.
The biggest thing that smelled like a rat to me was the narratives being pushed throughout fight week, about "Loma is old; does he have one more great performance; only a handful of old fighters have won this sort of fight.". Then when Muratalla was asked who he wanted next, and said "I want the winner of the main event," Top Rank said "You think you deserve Devin Haney?" Fight hadn't even happened yet, and they were acting like Haney had won.
Comment