Comments Thread For: Conor Benn Prepares For Another Legal Battle, UKAD Appeals Ruling That Cleared Him

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Smash
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2008
    • 14492
    • 6,044
    • 7,494
    • 21,172

    #11
    this clown is also constantly saying the wbc cleared him too, huh, they said he 'may' have eaten too many eggs & it resulted in his condition to fail the test, which he actually rejects as an argument himself, so the people who his is quoting as clearing him are actually wrong in his eyes too in their assessment, lol, its like a bad comedy sketch

    Comment

    • rudy
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Sep 2003
      • 5896
      • 655
      • 1,158
      • 52,192

      #12
      Originally posted by GBP4LIFE
      Piss off Benn.. you and BUMgardner can go juice up together
      They can have a gang**** her, Benn, Whyte funny all involved matchroom

      Comment

      • Smash
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Nov 2008
        • 14492
        • 6,044
        • 7,494
        • 21,172

        #13
        0_Caption-Dr-Usman-Sajjad-with-Tyson-Fury.webp

        64050365-11375345-image-a-13_1667262879327.jpg

        dr usman sajjad

        fav food, egg sambo with sliced boar, yum yum

        Comment

        • crisantonio917
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2015
          • 1284
          • 325
          • 51
          • 12,993

          #14
          Tell Conor to hook up with Baumgardner, they deserve each other juice it up baby!

          Comment

          • Smash
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2008
            • 14492
            • 6,044
            • 7,494
            • 21,172

            #15
            the headline says it all, getting caught with peds is now more of a legal issue than anything else, a legal inconvenience when it should be a standard ban based on the substance with no excuses accepted, this sort of stuff puts people off the sport i would say, unless u are a big fan of the person and actually believe them maybe

            Comment

            • kafkod
              I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2013
              • 24746
              • 2,173
              • 1,787
              • 405,373

              #16
              Originally posted by OctoberRed

              If you read the article, they claimed UKAD had no jurisdiction to punish him because VADA did the testing and the National Anti-Doping panel agreed. Rather than prove he didn't dope, his legal team would rather push a legal loophole
              The article says that, but as far as I can find out, the NAPD haven't published their findings, so where is the evidence that their ruling was based on jurisdiction, rather than "science"?

              Comment

              • Tonyu
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2012
                • 1325
                • 293
                • 70
                • 13,753

                #17
                Benn and Hearn signed up to VADA but somehow have a problem with their testing. Hearn needs to stop been a hypocrite as his taking a different stance on Benn, Whyte & Miller. Connor failed two tests he should face BBBoC take his ban and keep himself clean. He would have been more respect than going through all this denial.

                Comment

                • tokon
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 7627
                  • 1,822
                  • 1,255
                  • 42,234

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Smash
                  so what were the original findings that cleared benn from the national anti doping panel?

                  how did they explain his positive test? where did the clomid come from etc

                  in order to clear someone i presume u have to have evidence that they are not at fault? where is this evidence

                  if i was innocent & had this evidence surely i would be sharing it with everyone or maybe the report is out there somewhere & im just too lazy to find it
                  It seems Benn wasn't "cleared" with regards to whether he did/didn't have banned substance in his sample.

                  The judgement appears to be that UKAD have no jurisdiction to suspend or ban him as he didn't fail a UKAD test.

                  BBBC can't suspend him because he doesn't hold a BBBC licence.

                  Appears to me to be a very clever "legal" arguement that completely avoids the subject of whether/how/why Benn actually had PEDs in his system.

                  Comment

                  • tokon
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 7627
                    • 1,822
                    • 1,255
                    • 42,234

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Smash
                    0_Caption-Dr-Usman-Sajjad-with-Tyson-Fury.webp

                    64050365-11375345-image-a-13_1667262879327.jpg

                    dr usman sajjad

                    fav food, egg sambo with sliced boar, yum yum
                    Interesting.

                    Comment

                    • SteveM
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 8253
                      • 2,287
                      • 1,205
                      • 35,733

                      #20
                      Originally posted by OctoberRed

                      If you read the article, they claimed UKAD had no jurisdiction to punish him because VADA did the testing and the National Anti-Doping panel agreed. Rather than prove he didn't dope, his legal team would rather push a legal loophole
                      Surely UKAD can contract an international organisation to do their testing for them. For example VADA. Or they can validate a non-contracted organisation's testing results. Again VADA. Then there is the question of whether BBoB can use another agency's results. Why does it have to be a British testing agency that provides the results?

                      And then, if Benn agreed to VADA testing and by having his blood taken by a VADA agent he did agree the validity of VADA testing and test results, then how can he then afterwards claim that VADA's test results are invalid?

                      I would say that UKAD has every reason to appeal.

                      Having said that, the NAPD will have heard all the arguments that I outlined above. They also submit to WADA rules and testing as does UKAD normally. I think the crux of the matter is if Benn signed off on VADA testing - if he did I believe his argument is weakened.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP