Originally posted by buddyr
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Shakur Stevenson In Awe Of Terence Crawford: "The F------ Greatest"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Bostonfear View Post
On paper of course Floyds resume is better. I havent really seen anyone say otherwise? Even though in reality that resume is not as good as people say due to his selective timing.
We're just talking about how good we think Bud is, in terms of being a fighter and skills. And I think he's better than Floyd, and Floyd was obviously one of the best of his era. Even if he has almost lost at least a couple of fights, and a buncha lackluster fights where his scoring werent even real punches, just touches. Whereas Bud woulda knocked out Oscar.
As for Bud being selective, he fought the best fighters he could get his hands on. PBC refused to let any of their fighters fight him, so there is context and nuance to the argumentBostonfear likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by allen23 View Post
I've been watching boxing for 30-35 years and bud crawford would give any former welterweight a run for their money. Only emotional bias people would say otherwise. The man's got everything. He's strategic, great counter puncher, he can brawl when he needs to. He's got all the goods give the man his credit
Comment
-
Originally posted by Floyd is TBE View PostThis is ridiculous. Why are people acting like Spence was a prime Sugar Ray Robinson? Crawford won a fighter over a good welterweight. He didn't beat a hall of famer. He beat a good fighter. Stop the cape. He's not the first person to look impressive beating a B level fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by archiemoore1 View PostCheck my posts. I told u co.ksuckers what was gonna happen that Errol waa going to be hurt bad. Idk why ppl said Errol was the puncher. Yes Errol can thump- if u stand there and let him beat on u. I knew that wasn't about to happen. Now u same dudes that were riding the Errol bandwagon are saying Errol was washed up and over rated, that he was damaged goods. But he was actually a certifed bone breaker. Broke bones faces, eye sockets, ribs of many top fighters. So never discredit this man whatsoever. That minimizes Bud's accomplishments. When u knock his victory, do it while looking in the mirror, so u can see what kinda piece of sh.t u are, always criticizing and downplaying hard work and success. Bud came ready and did his job. No matter what Spence showed up, this was always going to be the outcome. And this is why Al Haymon and Fraud always blocked this fight for YEARS, because they always knew what was gonna happen if Errol and Bud met. Its that simple
Comment
-
Originally posted by greeneye99 View Post
Man
You hit the nail on the head
All these Spence fans claimed before the fight
"Errol breaks bones.."
"Bud Crawford would be running all night.."
"Lil Bud won't stand a chance..."
Now all Spence Fans are crying...
Errol Spence was always "Overrated"
"Weight drained"
Sheeeh just give Bud Crawford his props man
I'm talking to Champion4ever
Mexican _Puppet & few other New bandwagon Fans
Lolgreeneye99 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bostonfear View Post
On paper of course Floyds resume is better. I havent really seen anyone say otherwise? Even though in reality that resume is not as good as people say due to his selective timing.
We're just talking about how good we think Bud is, in terms of being a fighter and skills. And I think he's better than Floyd, and Floyd was obviously one of the best of his era. Even if he has almost lost at least a couple of fights, and a buncha lackluster fights where his scoring werent even real punches, just touches. Whereas Bud woulda knocked out Oscar.
As for Bud being selective, he fought the best fighters he could get his hands on. PBC refused to let any of their fighters fight him, so there is context and nuance to the argument
There is no such as “selective timing”. I’m pretty sure you’ll have something and examples to say about that but I will remind you that as you astutely stated, there is “context and nuances” that’s always left out when that accusation is thrown around.
As you know, I’m boxing, 1+1 is never 2 because of the nuances we both know of. PAC easily destroyed Hatton but could never beat Floyd at any given time while it took Floyd 10 rounds to put the guy away.
Comment
Comment