Originally posted by Gary Coleman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bookmark this: Spence beats Crawford, NSB accuses him of aging Crawford out (excuse).
Collapse
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Kzbox View PostI think Spence wins but i wouldn't be so bold with the bookmark this Crawford has a very good chance of winning too and u know how boxing fans are they will always dig this up to roast you if you are wrong.
In fact, I probably should dedicate a YouTube audio episode on why I believe it.
I firmly believe that NSB ignores just how good Errol Spence is because he isn't flashy with it.
Comment
-
-
Aging out has always been a dumb excuse. It's not like the fighter being accused lives in an ageless vacuumPunch on Tap Combat Talk Radio like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post
But then the excuse is "yeah but Fighter B's style ages them faster". That's what they said about Pacquiao.Combat Talk Radio likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheIronMike View PostAging out has always been a dumb excuse. It's not like the fighter being accused lives in an ageless vacuum
Spence is more the technical workman. Spence breaks his opponents down with a relentless superior technique. Even if they were both 35, the waiting game would favor the technical fighter. Technical knowledge and ability does not decreases with age and experience, rather the opposite.
that said, Crawford by KO.
Comment
Comment