Barrios had a rehydration clause too wth

[Roadblock]

I fckn hate this shyt. This is on the same level as Canelo putting a hydration clause on Fielding. The difference is that if you complain about Tank, you're just a hater, probably a racist too.

A weight clause with 10/12 hours left of rehydration is not the elephant in the room people try to make out, the IBF implemented it as a safety rule, if it was medically proven to dehydrate a fighter prior to fighting they could be sued to the high heavens..

The key is the 10/12 hours left that allows a guy to rehydrate to whatever he wants, seeing as it is half the time frame at 10lbs, that's means there is potential for 20lbs rehydration over double the time, so whats the issue?

[joseph5620]

canelo has had LOADS of stick & still does about being a-side clause guy

tank isnt even near his level of crap, yet

Canelo is much worse. Holding a middleweight belt but refusing to fight Golovkin above 155. That went on for a substantial amount of time.

[Smash]

that's means there is potential for 20lbs rehydration over double the time, so whats the issue?

to be fair there must be a reason for the clauses, if it was just rehydrate to whatever u want then why bother with them at all

[4truth]

A weight clause with 10/12 hours left of rehydration is not the elephant in the room people try to make out, the IBF implemented it as a safety rule, if it was medically proven to dehydrate a fighter prior to fighting they could be sued to the high heavens..

The key is the 10/12 hours left that allows a guy to rehydrate to whatever he wants, seeing as it is half the time frame at 10lbs, that's means there is potential for 20lbs rehydration over double the time, so whats the issue?

Recovering from severe dehydration can take a lot more than 12 hours even with an IV. It's the severity of dehydration that determines the time needed to properly recover. What part of that do you not understand?

[Roadblock]

to be fair there must be a reason for the clauses, if it was just rehydrate to whatever u want then why bother with them at all

There is the mind games involved, the powerplay, let's say the fight was IBF the clause wouldn't get a mention because the A side is not forcing it, if it were really hurting a fighter nobody would sign and the IBF wouldn't make it mandatory. The rehydration clauses are nothing with many hours left to rehydrate, the CW that's another thing all together, the CW is the advantage maker not the IBF weight clause.

[joseph5620]

I fckn hate this shyt. This is on the same level as Canelo putting a hydration clause on Fielding. The difference is that if you complain about Tank, you're just a hater, probably a racist too.

He put one on Jacobs too but you conveniently left that out. In a unification fight so that's worse and bigger than the Fielding fight. Have you ever criticized Canelo for that on this site? No you haven't. Have you criticized Tank? Yes you have. Lots of times. The perceptions of you are from your own doing.

[4truth]

He put one on Jacobs too but you conveniently left that out. In a unification fight so that's worse and bigger than the Fielding fight. Have you ever criticized Canelo for that on this site? No you haven't. Have you criticized Tank? Yes you have. Lots of times. The perceptions of you are from your own doing.

Go back to any thread that I participated in having to do with Jacobs and the rehydration clause. Nobody complained louder than me.

Edit: Oh, and fck you

[Smash]

He put one on Jacobs too but you conveniently left that out. In a unification fight so that's worse and bigger than the Fielding fight. Have you ever criticized Canelo for that on this site? No you haven't. Have you criticized Tank? Yes you have. Lots of times. The perceptions of you are from your own doing.

ggg didnt slap a clause on jacobs but that didnt stop canelo fans saying he beat him easier than ggg

fans dont care about clauses the fighters they like impose on other fighters

#nomoreclauses

[Roadblock]

Recovering from severe dehydration can take a lot more than 12 hours even with an IV. It's the severity of dehydration that determines the time needed to properly recover. What part of that do you not understand?

Fighters are not this severe, a bleed-out victim being severe, you can gain 20 lbs in 24 hrs without IV, I had a dog once that lost 11lbs over night, he was 44lb, he gained it back in 7 hrs, you would be surprised what you can put back on, by using an enema with IV fluids its nearly as absorbing as direct IV, way more so than through the stomach.

Your talking about what you don't understand and so you claim all this dehydration, but that's not how it works out, the CW is more damaging the IBF rule is not.

[4truth]

Fighters are not this severe, a bleed-out victim being severe, you can gain 20 lbs in 24 hrs without IV, I had a dog once that lost 11lbs over night, he was 44lb, he gained it back in 7 hrs, you would be surprised what you can put back on, by using an enema with IV fluids its nearly as absorbing as direct IV, way more so than through the stomach.

Your talking about what you don't understand and so you claim all this dehydration, but that's not how it works out, the CW is more damaging the IBF rule is not.

I understand fine. Canelo for instance, he was against the rails at 154, that was his absolute limit that he could recover from. Your hero put another 2 pounds on him and it was that last straw. Next day weigh in, where he had been 172 in the fight before, he weighed 165. Jacobs and Kovalev were up against it too, so the abused Canelo took advantage and became the abuser.